Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$21.76
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.81M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 714M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. BIASX (-9.78). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. BIASX (-17.94).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.041 | 1.400 | -217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 714M | 41.1M | 1,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.78 | -2.18 | 450% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.30 | 20.96 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.94 | -0.99 | 1,818% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.36 | N/A | - |