Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$22.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets869.04M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. BIASX (-4.30). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. BIASX (-7.94).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.537 | 5.832 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 869M | 44.8M | 1,940% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.30 | 4.77 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.72 | 22.83 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.94 | 17.13 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.70 | N/A | - |