Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$22.35
Change-$0.16 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.2M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.85
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.34M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. WCMLX (43.3M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. BIASX (-4.93). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.77 vs. BIASX (-2.36).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.045 | -0.078 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 43.3M | 2,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.93 | -0.77 | 639% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.57 | 21.57 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.36 | 20.77 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement