Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$22.61
Change+$0.22 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.2M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.95
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 802M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. BIASX (-5.01). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. BIASX (-11.61).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.134 | 6.843 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 802M | 43.7M | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.01 | 4.73 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.44 | 34.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.61 | 12.53 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement