Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. WCMLX (51.1M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.11). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. BIASX (-0.22). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.87 vs. BIASX (-30.32).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.99 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.79 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.188 | 8.212 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 51.1M | 1,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.22 | 13.84 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.37 | 19.79 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.32 | -3.87 | 783% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.90 | N/A | - |