Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 576M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.11). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. BIASX (3.41). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. BIASX (-25.07).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.99 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.79 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.903 | 11.410 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 576M | 51.9M | 1,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | 17.02 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.25 | 32.50 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.07 | 3.16 | -793% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers