Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BIAWX (4.29B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: RGAGX (0.52) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BIAWX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BIAWX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). BIAWX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: BIAWX (100) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. BIAWX (-17.49). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.08 vs. BIAWX (2.17).
| BIAWX | RGAGX | BIAWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.527 | 5.796 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.49 | 1.96 | -893% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.32 | 37.42 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.17 | 15.08 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.07 | 103.10 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement