Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BIAWX (4.35B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: RGAGX (0.51) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BIAWX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BIAWX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). BIAWX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: BIAWX (100) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. BIAWX (-16.43). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. BIAWX (5.42).
| BIAWX | RGAGX | BIAWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.990 | 7.335 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.35B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.43 | 4.75 | -346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.86 | 41.00 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.42 | 17.74 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.22 | 106.44 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement