Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs RGAGX
BIAWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BIAWX (4.27B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: RGAGX (0.51) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BIAWX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BIAWX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). BIAWX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: BIAWX (100) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. BIAWX (-14.50). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. BIAWX (7.80).
| BIAWX | RGAGX | BIAWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.442 | 8.887 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.50 | 12.55 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 50.34 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.80 | 20.99 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.20 | 122.10 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement