Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs FWWNX
BIEMX vs FWWNX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs FWWNX
BIEMX vs FWWNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BIEMX (1.27B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than BIEMX: FWWNX (1.21) vs BIEMX (0.33). BIEMX was incepted earlier than FWWNX: BIEMX (21 years) vs FWWNX (6 years). BIEMX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: FWWNX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.13 vs. FWWNX (29.85). FWWNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.01 vs. BIEMX (11.86).
| BIEMX | FWWNX | BIEMX / FWWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.62 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.566 | 18.145 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.21 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 65.13 | 29.85 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.58 | 49.04 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | 23.01 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement