Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FFNAX
BIICX vs FFNAX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FFNAX
BIICX vs FFNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FFNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FFNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FFNAX (2.81B). BIICX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: BIICX (5.91) vs FFNAX (2.15). BIICX was incepted earlier than FFNAX: BIICX (18 years) vs FFNAX (19 years). FFNAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than BIICX (0.68). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FFNAX (27.00). FFNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FFNAX (0) vs BIICX (2000000). FFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. BIICX (9.31). BIICX (21.57) and FFNAX (20.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BIICX | FFNAX | BIICX / FFNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.78 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.80 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.072 | 7.367 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.81B | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 2.15 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 14.67 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 34.84 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.57 | 20.85 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.66 | 66.60 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement