Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FHLKX
BIICX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FHLKX
BIICX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FHLKX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FHLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FHLKX (73.1M). BIICX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BIICX (5.91) vs FHLKX (2.86). BIICX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BIICX (18 years) vs FHLKX (6 years). BIICX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FHLKX (54.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FHLKX (0) vs BIICX (2000000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. BIICX (9.31). FHLKX (21.92) and BIICX (21.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BIICX | FHLKX | BIICX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.39 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.40 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.072 | 6.945 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 73.1M | 14,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 2.86 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 14.49 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 34.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.57 | 21.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement