Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FSRKX
BIICX vs FSRKX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FSRKX
BIICX vs FSRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FSRKX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FSRKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FSRKX (592M). BIICX pays higher dividends than FSRKX: BIICX (5.95) vs FSRKX (4.36). BIICX was incepted earlier than FSRKX: BIICX (18 years) vs FSRKX (7 years). BIICX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSRKX (0.64). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSRKX (29.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FSRKX (0) vs BIICX (2000000). FSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. BIICX (8.67). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 33.09 vs. BIICX (22.22).
| BIICX | FSRKX | BIICX / FSRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.51 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.64 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.293 | 6.316 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 592M | 1,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.95 | 4.36 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 11.83 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 29.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 33.09 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement