Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FSRTX
BIICX vs FSRTX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FSRTX
BIICX vs FSRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FSRTX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FSRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. FSRTX (542M). BIICX pays higher dividends than FSRTX: BIICX (6.06) vs FSRTX (4.22). BIICX was incepted earlier than FSRTX: BIICX (18 years) vs FSRTX (21 years). FSRTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BIICX (0.68). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSRTX (29.00). FSRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FSRTX (0) vs BIICX (2000000). FSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. BIICX (5.64). FSRTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.73 vs. BIICX (21.30).
| BIICX | FSRTX | BIICX / FSRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.95 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.05 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.299 | 10.784 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 542M | 1,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.06 | 4.22 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 13.71 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.24 | 30.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.30 | 33.73 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.75 | 64.12 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement