Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FTANX
BIICX vs FTANX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FTANX
BIICX vs FTANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FTANX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FTANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FTANX (2.27B). BIICX pays higher dividends than FTANX: BIICX (5.91) vs FTANX (2.71). BIICX was incepted earlier than FTANX: BIICX (18 years) vs FTANX (19 years). BIICX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FTANX (0.53). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTANX (24.00). FTANX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FTANX (0) vs BIICX (2000000). FTANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. BIICX (10.04). BIICX return over 5 years is better than : 22.24 vs. FTANX (20.71).
| BIICX | FTANX | BIICX / FTANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.50 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.53 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.461 | 6.070 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.27B | 462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 2.71 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.04 | 14.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 31.68 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.24 | 20.71 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.31 | 59.76 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement