Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINSX vs RERFX
BINSX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BINSX vs RERFX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
Price$15.02
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.75
Change-$0.52 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
BINSX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINSX vs. RERFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINSX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BINSX (2.11B). RERFX pays higher dividends than BINSX: RERFX (0.88) vs BINSX (0.54). BINSX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BINSX (8 years) vs RERFX (23 years). BINSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINSX (20.00). BINSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: BINSX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. BINSX (6.30). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.55 vs. BINSX (7.77).
| BINSX | RERFX | BINSX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.52 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.52 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.054 | 18.804 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.88 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 8.03 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.43 | 51.36 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.77 | 17.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement