Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGACX
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGACX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$55.08
Change+$0.23 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.32
Change+$0.59 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. BIOPX (1.79B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGACX (0.07) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BIOPX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGACX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.50 vs. RGACX (13.74). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.81 vs. RGACX (41.40).
| BIOPX | RGACX | BIOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.860 | 19.906 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 343B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 13.74 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.18 | 67.77 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.81 | 41.40 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.78 | 96.68 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement