Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGAFX
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$53.44
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.07
Change-$0.43 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BIOPX (1.76B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGAFX (0.55) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: BIOPX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.79 vs. RGAFX (17.13). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.41 vs. RGAFX (50.03).
| BIOPX | RGAFX | BIOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.378 | 18.342 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.79 | 17.13 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.58 | 63.63 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.41 | 50.03 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 197.19 | 106.58 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement