BITF
Price
$1.76
Change
-$0.09 (-4.86%)
Updated
May 16, 6:59 PM EST
106 days until earnings call
WULF
Price
$2.02
Change
-$0.09 (-4.25%)
Updated
May 16, 6:59 PM EST
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BITF vs WULF

Header iconBITF vs WULF Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs WULFBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$1.76
Change-$0.09 (-4.86%)
Volume$6.56M
CapitalizationN/A
TeraWulf
Price$2.02
Change-$0.09 (-4.25%)
Volume$6.94M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BITF vs WULF Comparison Chart

Loading...

BITFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
WULFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BITF vs. WULF commentary
May 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Hold and WULF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2024
Stock price -- (BITF: $1.85 vs. WULF: $2.12)
Brand notoriety: BITF and WULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 130% vs. WULF: 88%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $742.84M vs. WULF: $731.41M
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $742.84M. WULF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $731.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BITF and WULF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BITF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BITF is a better buy in the short-term than WULF.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +8.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15985.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Aug 30, 2024.

WULF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+8.67% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BITF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for WULF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITF($743M) and WULF($731M) have the same market capitalization . WULF YTD gains are higher at: -11.667 vs. BITF (-36.426). WULF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 161K vs. BITF (-7.73M). BITF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. WULF (54.4M). BITF has less debt than WULF: BITF (19.9M) vs WULF (124M). BITF has higher revenues than WULF: BITF (146M) vs WULF (69.2M).
BITFWULFBITF / WULF
Capitalization743M731M102%
EBITDA-7.73M161K-4,802%
Gain YTD-36.426-11.667312%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue146M69.2M211%
Total Cash116M54.4M213%
Total Debt19.9M124M16%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITFWULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BITFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
WULFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FISPX7.870.09
+1.16%
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index IS
FPPVX11.850.10
+0.85%
MFS Prudent Investor R6
NPNCX44.910.37
+0.83%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C
TASHX13.760.10
+0.73%
Transamerica Multi-Asset Income A
OSPSX8.700.02
+0.23%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R6

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
+14.91%
HUT - BITF
84%
Closely correlated
+13.35%
MARA - BITF
78%
Closely correlated
+11.79%
RIOT - BITF
77%
Closely correlated
+6.13%
BTBT - BITF
76%
Closely correlated
+4.87%
CLSK - BITF
74%
Closely correlated
+11.46%
More

WULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WULF
1D Price
Change %
WULF100%
+4.18%
MARA - WULF
78%
Closely correlated
+11.79%
CLSK - WULF
78%
Closely correlated
+11.46%
RIOT - WULF
77%
Closely correlated
+6.13%
BTBT - WULF
74%
Closely correlated
+4.87%
BITF - WULF
69%
Closely correlated
+14.91%
More