BITQ
Price
$26.83
Change
-$0.72 (-2.61%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
461.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FDIG
Price
$45.08
Change
-$0.89 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
304.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITQ vs FDIG

BITQ vs FDIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) vs. Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG)

Key Takeaways

  • BITQ tracks the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index and maintains a concentrated portfolio of 30 holdings focused on crypto ecosystem companies, while FDIG tracks the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index with broader exposure across approximately 60 holdings that include digital payments firms.
  • BITQ carries a higher expense ratio of 0.85% compared to FDIG’s 0.39%, reflecting differences in index construction and provider fee structures.
  • Sector allocations for both ETFs emphasize financial services and technology, yet BITQ shows heavier weighting toward crypto mining and infrastructure firms, whereas FDIG incorporates greater digital payments processing exposure.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies with periodic rebalancing and are non-diversified, resulting in elevated volatility relative to broad equity benchmarks during crypto market cycles.
  • FDIG offers a more cost-efficient structure and wider diversification, while BITQ provides targeted exposure to leading crypto innovators through a smaller, higher-conviction basket.
  • These ETFs serve as complementary rather than direct competitors, allowing investors to select based on preferences for concentration versus breadth within the cryptocurrency and blockchain thematic space.

Introduction

BITQ and FDIG both deliver equity-based exposure to the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem without direct ownership of digital assets. They target companies involved in crypto mining, infrastructure, financial services, and related technologies, making them relevant alternatives for investors seeking regulated access to this thematic sector. The ETFs do not compete head-to-head but instead represent differentiated strategies within the same broad category, with BITQ emphasizing a focused innovator basket and FDIG incorporating digital payments alongside core crypto activities. This comparison highlights structural distinctions that influence risk, cost, and positioning in evolving market conditions.

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) Overview

BITQ is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the total return performance of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. The index selects global companies deriving the majority of revenue from crypto-related activities, including mining, equipment suppliers, and financial services firms servicing the crypto ecosystem. The fund maintains approximately 30 holdings and applies modified market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include names such as IREN, HUT, MSTR, and COIN. Sector exposure concentrates in financial services (around 70%) and technology (around 25%). The expense ratio stands at 0.85%. BITQ is structured as a non-diversified thematic ETF listed on NYSE Arca, emphasizing high-conviction crypto innovators.

Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) Overview

FDIG is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index. The index captures a global universe of companies engaged in cryptocurrency activities, blockchain technology, and digital payments processing, selected based on revenue exposure and weighted by average daily trading volume. The fund holds approximately 60 securities and follows rules-based rebalancing. Holdings span a wider array of crypto infrastructure and payments firms compared with more concentrated peers. Sector allocations similarly favor financial services and technology but distribute exposure more broadly. The expense ratio is 0.39%. FDIG operates as a non-diversified thematic ETF with listings on major U.S. exchanges, providing cost-efficient access to the combined crypto and digital payments theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The cryptocurrency and blockchain sector continues to evolve amid regulatory developments, institutional adoption, and macroeconomic influences such as interest rate expectations and risk sentiment. Capital flows into digital asset infrastructure remain sensitive to policy clarity from U.S. and global regulators, while earnings cycles of mining and payments companies respond to crypto price trends and network activity levels. Broader equity market rotation toward technology and growth themes can amplify sector momentum, whereas tightening financial conditions or geopolitical tensions may increase volatility. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic environment, where innovation in decentralized finance and payment rails drives long-term structural growth alongside periodic drawdowns tied to market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited elevated volatility consistent with their concentrated crypto thematic focus, with performance influenced by sector rotation, holdings earnings, and macro shifts including interest rate expectations. BITQ’s narrower 30-stock basket tends to amplify moves tied to leading miners and infrastructure names, while FDIG’s broader construction and digital payments inclusion can moderate relative swings. Over recent weeks and months, positioning differences have manifested through varying sensitivity to crypto ecosystem catalysts versus payments processing trends. FDIG’s lower expense ratio supports more efficient compounding over longer horizons, whereas BITQ’s concentration may suit investors seeking sharper exposure to crypto innovation leaders.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities in thematic ETFs like BITQ and FDIG through the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings, and balanced exposure to digital payments alongside core crypto themes, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to FDIG for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and risk mitigation within the sector. BITQ retains appeal for those seeking higher-conviction concentration in crypto innovators, though its elevated fees and narrower basket introduce comparatively higher structural costs and volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BITQ vs. FDIG commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITQ is a Hold and FDIG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITQ has more net assets: 462M vs. FDIG (304M). BITQ has a higher annual dividend yield than FDIG: BITQ (34.621) vs FDIG (17.501). BITQ was incepted earlier than FDIG: BITQ (5 years) vs FDIG (4 years). FDIG (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BITQ (0.85). FDIG has a higher turnover BITQ (56.00) vs BITQ (56.00).
BITQFDIGBITQ / FDIG
Gain YTD34.62117.501198%
Net Assets462M304M152%
Total Expense Ratio0.850.39218%
Turnover56.0079.0071%
Yield0.000.99-
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITQFDIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FDIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAITX23.54N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Stock Adv
HRLAX10.57N/A
N/A
Hartford Real Asset A
RRREX24.17N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities S
VGREX7.51N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Global Real Estate
AIVFX21.20-0.45
-2.08%
American Funds International Vntg F-2

BITQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITQ has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITQ jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITQ
1D Price
Change %
BITQ100%
-2.61%
CLSK - BITQ
85%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
RIOT - BITQ
85%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HUT - BITQ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CIFR - BITQ
81%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
MARA - BITQ
81%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More

FDIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDIG has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDIG jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDIG
1D Price
Change %
FDIG100%
-1.95%
CLSK - FDIG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
RIOT - FDIG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HUT - FDIG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CIFR - FDIG
80%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
MARA - FDIG
80%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More