BITQ
Price
$26.83
Change
-$0.72 (-2.61%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
461.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WGMI
Price
$70.98
Change
-$1.00 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
394.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITQ vs WGMI

BITQ vs WGMI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) vs. CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI)

Key Takeaways

  • BITQ tracks a passive index of 30-34 crypto industry innovators, offering broader exposure to blockchain, mining, exchanges, and related technology firms, while WGMI is an actively managed fund concentrated on Bitcoin mining operations and supporting services.
  • WGMI maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.75% compared to BITQ’s 0.85%, potentially improving net returns for cost-sensitive investors over longer holding periods.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high concentration in the top 10 holdings (typically 60-80% of assets), with significant overlap in Bitcoin mining companies such as IREN Ltd. (IREN), Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), and Core Scientific Inc. (CORZ), though WGMI skews more exclusively toward pure-play miners.
  • Sector allocations for both center on Financial Services and Technology, reflecting their shared focus on cryptocurrency infrastructure, though BITQ includes additional exposure to software platforms and trading venues like Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN).
  • BITQ provides diversified thematic access across the broader crypto ecosystem, while WGMI delivers targeted leverage to Bitcoin network security and mining economics, resulting in differing volatility profiles tied to hash rate trends and energy costs.
  • Structural differences position BITQ as a passive, rules-based vehicle and WGMI as an active strategy that can adjust holdings based on operational fundamentals of mining firms.

Introduction

BITQ and WGMI both target the cryptocurrency sector but pursue distinct strategies within the same thematic universe. BITQ offers broad exposure to companies driving crypto innovation, whereas WGMI narrows focus to Bitcoin mining operations. Investors comparing these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often seek to understand trade-offs between diversified thematic access and concentrated industry exposure. The comparison remains relevant amid evolving regulatory clarity, Bitcoin network developments, and capital allocation trends within digital assets.

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) Overview

The Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) seeks to track the total return performance of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. This passive, rules-based strategy selects approximately 30 companies involved in cryptocurrency markets, including miners, exchanges, and infrastructure providers. The fund typically holds 32-34 securities, with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 60-68% of assets. Prominent holdings often include IREN Ltd. (IREN), Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), Strategy Inc. (MSTR), Riot Platforms Inc. (RIOT), and Core Scientific Inc. (CORZ). Sector exposure concentrates in Financial Services and Technology. BITQ charges an expense ratio of 0.85% and rebalances according to index methodology to maintain target weights.

CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) Overview

The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its net assets in companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or profits from Bitcoin mining or related services such as specialized hardware and software. The strategy typically maintains 27-28 holdings, with the top 10 often representing 79-80% of assets. Key positions frequently feature Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR), IREN Ltd. (IREN), TeraWulf Inc. (WULF), Core Scientific Inc. (CORZ), and MARA Holdings Inc. (MARA). Sector weights emphasize Financial Services and Technology. WGMI applies an expense ratio of 0.75% and allows the manager flexibility to adjust allocations based on operational and market conditions.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the cryptocurrency and blockchain infrastructure sector. Key macro drivers include Bitcoin price cycles, regulatory developments around digital assets, energy market dynamics affecting mining profitability, and broader adoption of blockchain technology. Capital flows into crypto-related equities often correlate with institutional interest in Bitcoin as a store of value and network security. Risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, technological obsolescence, and sensitivity to interest rate expectations that influence risk-asset valuations. The environment favors companies with efficient operations and scalable infrastructure amid ongoing sector maturation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, BITQ has reflected broader crypto ecosystem momentum through its diversified holdings in miners and platforms, while WGMI has shown tighter linkage to Bitcoin mining economics, including hash rate growth and electricity costs. Relative positioning highlights BITQ’s potential for steadier participation across multiple crypto sub-sectors versus WGMI’s higher sensitivity to pure mining margins. Volatility differences arise from concentration levels and active versus passive management approaches, with both ETFs experiencing amplified movements during periods of Bitcoin price fluctuations and sector rotation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, WGMI’s lower expense ratio and focused active mandate on Bitcoin mining may offer a slight probabilistic edge in the current environment for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and targeted sector momentum, though BITQ’s broader diversification could suit those seeking reduced single-industry concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BITQ vs. WGMI commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITQ is a Hold and WGMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITQ has more net assets: 462M vs. WGMI (394M). WGMI has a higher annual dividend yield than BITQ: WGMI (85.472) vs BITQ (34.621). BITQ was incepted earlier than WGMI: BITQ (5 years) vs WGMI (4 years). WGMI (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than BITQ (0.85). BITQ has a higher turnover WGMI (40.00) vs WGMI (40.00).
BITQWGMIBITQ / WGMI
Gain YTD34.62185.47241%
Net Assets462M394M117%
Total Expense Ratio0.850.75113%
Turnover56.0040.00140%
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITQWGMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WGMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSRNX17.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Index
WMKGX24.63N/A
N/A
WesMark Large Company Fund
PAMCX92.69N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
PABFX19.72N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced Z
DADGX24.47N/A
N/A
Dunham Small Cap Growth A

BITQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITQ has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITQ jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITQ
1D Price
Change %
BITQ100%
-2.61%
CLSK - BITQ
85%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
RIOT - BITQ
85%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HUT - BITQ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CIFR - BITQ
81%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
MARA - BITQ
81%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More

WGMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGMI has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WGMI jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGMI
1D Price
Change %
WGMI100%
-1.39%
CIFR - WGMI
91%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
IREN - WGMI
87%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
HUT - WGMI
86%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
RIOT - WGMI
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CLSK - WGMI
83%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More