BITS
Price
$62.33
Change
-$1.61 (-2.52%)
Updated
Jun 23, 12:54 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
28.64M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FDIG
Price
$45.01
Change
-$0.96 (-2.09%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
304.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITS vs FDIG

BITS vs FDIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) vs. Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG)

Key Takeaways

  • BITS is an actively managed ETF that gains exposure primarily through holdings in another Global X blockchain ETF and Bitcoin futures contracts, resulting in a highly concentrated portfolio with just a handful of effective positions.
  • FDIG offers broader equity exposure to approximately 49 companies involved in cryptocurrency mining, infrastructure, exchanges, and digital payments, providing greater diversification within the crypto ecosystem.
  • FDIG carries a lower expense ratio of 0.39% compared to BITS at 0.65%, potentially improving net returns for long-term holders in this thematic space.
  • Both ETFs target the blockchain and digital assets sector but differ in structure: BITS combines equity blockchain exposure with direct Bitcoin futures, while FDIG focuses exclusively on listed equities tied to crypto and payments.
  • FDIG’s larger number of holdings and lower cost structure may appeal to investors seeking diversified equity-based crypto industry exposure, whereas BITS provides a more concentrated, futures-inclusive approach to Bitcoin and blockchain themes.
  • Structural differences in holdings concentration and expense ratios represent key considerations for investors evaluating risk-adjusted exposure to the evolving crypto and blockchain markets.

Introduction

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) both provide investors with access to the rapidly evolving blockchain, cryptocurrency, and digital payments sectors. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products but instead represent alternative strategies within the same thematic universe. BITS emphasizes a concentrated mix of blockchain equities and Bitcoin futures, while FDIG delivers diversified equity exposure across crypto-related businesses. Comparing them helps investors understand trade-offs in structure, cost, and exposure profiles amid ongoing sector innovation and adoption trends.

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) Overview

The Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) is an actively managed fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in blockchain companies and long positions in U.S.-listed Bitcoin futures contracts. The fund typically allocates the majority of assets to the Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH), with additional exposure to Bitcoin futures and short-term Treasury instruments. It maintains a small number of holdings, often around four effective positions, making it highly concentrated. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. This structure distinguishes BITS as a hybrid approach blending equity blockchain exposure with futures-based Bitcoin access, rather than holding individual stocks or spot Bitcoin directly.

Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) Overview

The Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) seeks to track the performance of companies engaged in cryptocurrency-related activities and digital payments. It holds a diversified portfolio of approximately 49 equities, with significant allocations to Bitcoin miners, blockchain infrastructure providers, cryptocurrency exchanges, and related technology firms. Top holdings typically include companies such as IREN, HUT, APLD, WULF, RIOT, and COIN. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.39% and follows a passive index-based strategy focused on global equities in the crypto and payments space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The blockchain and cryptocurrency sector continues to evolve amid regulatory developments, institutional adoption, and technological advancements in digital assets and payments infrastructure. Key drivers include expanding use cases for blockchain technology, growth in cryptocurrency mining operations, and integration of digital payments solutions across financial services. Macro factors such as interest rate expectations and risk sentiment influence capital flows into high-volatility thematic areas. Sector risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, technological obsolescence, and correlation with broader equity and commodity markets. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic environment, where innovation in crypto ecosystems and digital finance remains a primary catalyst.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have exhibited distinct behaviors tied to their structural differences. BITS’ concentrated exposure, including Bitcoin futures, has led to heightened sensitivity to Bitcoin price movements and futures roll dynamics. FDIG’s broader equity holdings across miners and infrastructure providers have aligned more closely with equity market rotations and company-specific earnings in the crypto space. During periods of sector momentum, FDIG’s diversification may moderate volatility relative to BITS’ more futures-oriented profile. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between concentrated thematic bets and diversified equity exposure within the same underlying industry trends.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities in blockchain and crypto themes with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor FDIG with moderate probability. Its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and diversified equity exposure to the crypto industry provide a more balanced risk profile and cost efficiency compared to BITS’ concentrated, higher-cost, futures-inclusive approach. This positioning aligns with broader sector momentum in equity-based crypto plays while mitigating some concentration risks inherent in BITS.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BITS vs. FDIG commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITS is a Hold and FDIG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDIG has more net assets: 304M vs. BITS (28.6M). FDIG has a higher annual dividend yield than BITS: FDIG (19.842) vs BITS (1.953). BITS was incepted earlier than FDIG: BITS (5 years) vs FDIG (4 years). FDIG (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BITS (0.65). FDIG has a higher turnover BITS (18.03) vs BITS (18.03).
BITSFDIGBITS / FDIG
Gain YTD1.95319.84210%
Net Assets28.6M304M9%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.39167%
Turnover18.0379.0023%
Yield20.350.992,054%
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITSFDIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FDIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAAPX43.33N/A
N/A
Ariel Appreciation Investor
ARSMX9.79N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
ACSHX33.64N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock R5
AGCSX23.66N/A
N/A
American Century Global Small Cap I
GAOTX21.84N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Global Allocation R3

FDIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDIG has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDIG jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDIG
1D Price
Change %
FDIG100%
-0.65%
CLSK - FDIG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
RIOT - FDIG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
HUT - FDIG
83%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
CIFR - FDIG
80%
Closely correlated
-3.56%
MARA - FDIG
80%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
More