Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.73B vs. BIVRX (866M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVRX (2.20) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVRX (9 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVRX (3.32) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.64). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 197.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.88 vs. BIVRX (-2.19). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.42 vs. BIVRX (-9.58).
| BIVRX | NLSAX | BIVRX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.30 | 1.64 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.64 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.395 | 2.231 | -421% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 866M | 7.73B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.19 | 5.88 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.94 | 23.35 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.58 | 20.42 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement