Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.63B vs. BIVRX (640M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVRX (2.20) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVRX (9 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVRX (3.32) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.64). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 197.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. BIVRX (-16.04). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.79 vs. BIVRX (-14.96).
| BIVRX | NLSAX | BIVRX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.30 | 1.64 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.64 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.133 | 0.913 | -2,425% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 7.63B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.04 | 5.34 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.41 | 21.39 | -156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.96 | 16.79 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers