Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs NLSCX
BIVRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
BIVRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. BIVRX (980M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVRX (3.57) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVRX (8 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVRX (3.42) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.62 vs. BIVRX (1.52). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 67.46 vs. NLSCX (16.11).
| BIVRX | NLSCX | BIVRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 2.43 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 2.43 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.479 | 5.540 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 7.82B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.21 | 20.14 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.46 | 16.11 | 419% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement