BKCH vs WULF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKCH is a Hold and WULF is a StrongSell.
WULF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BKCH | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MDOBX | 9.28 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity C | |||
| MXMVX | 14.88 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| Empower Mid Cap Value Inv | |||
| AEDMX | 11.56 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| American Century Emerging Markets R6 | |||
| JNBZX | 10.15 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| JPMorgan Income Builder R6 | |||
| NEMCX | 19.29 | -0.05 | -0.26% |
| Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq C | |||
BKCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKCH has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKCH jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKCH | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| RIOT - BKCH | 92% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| CLSK - BKCH | 91% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| MARA - BKCH | 90% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| HIVE - BKCH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| WULF - BKCH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
WULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| CLSK - WULF | 77% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| RIOT - WULF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| BTBT - WULF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| MARA - WULF | 74% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| HIVE - WULF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||