BKFL
Price
$16.00
Change
-$0.25 (-1.54%)
Updated
Jan 29 closing price
Capitalization
41.34M
MSBB
Price
$14.40
Change
-$0.24 (-1.64%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

BKFL vs MSBB

Header iconBKFL vs MSBB Comparison
Open Charts BKFL vs MSBBBanner chart's image
BankFlorida Ban
Price$16.00
Change-$0.25 (-1.54%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization41.34M
Mercer Ban
Price$14.40
Change-$0.24 (-1.64%)
Volume$1.44K
CapitalizationN/A
BKFL vs MSBB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKFL vs. MSBB commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKFL is a Hold and MSBB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BKFL: $16.00 vs. MSBB: $14.40)
Brand notoriety: BKFL and MSBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKFL: 156% vs. MSBB: 193%
Market capitalization -- BKFL: $41.34M vs. MSBB: $0
BKFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.34M. MSBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSBB is a better buy in the long-term than BKFL.

Price Growth

BKFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSBB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSBB YTD gains are higher at: 2.857 vs. BKFL (-1.538).
BKFLMSBBBKFL / MSBB
Capitalization41.3MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.5382.857-54%
P/E Ratio16.26N/A-
Revenue11.7MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWSH7.140.14
+2.00%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
SPTI28.160.13
+0.46%
SPDR® Portfolio Intmdt Term Trs ETF
LQDW26.330.03
+0.11%
iShares Invm Grd Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
MEAR50.240.05
+0.10%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
FCTR33.63-1.20
-3.44%
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF

BKFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKFL has been loosely correlated with PEBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKFL jumps, then PEBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKFL
1D Price
Change %
BKFL100%
N/A
PEBC - BKFL
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBTT - BKFL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMBF - BKFL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEBC - BKFL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSBB - BKFL
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More

MSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBB and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBB and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBB
1D Price
Change %
MSBB100%
-1.64%
FNWD - MSBB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKIMF - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCAP - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
NSTS - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More