BKH
Price
$74.69
Change
-$0.60 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.73B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OGS
Price
$80.30
Change
-$0.24 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.05B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKH vs OGS

BKH vs OGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Black Hills Corporation (BKH) vs. ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Black Hills Corporation (BKH) operates a diversified electric-and-gas utility model across eight states, while ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) is a pure-play regulated natural gas distributor serving over 2.3 million customers across Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
  • BKH is advancing a transformative all-stock merger with NorthWestern Energy and carries a rapidly expanding data center pipeline exceeding 3 gigawatts (GW), creating a distinct growth catalyst not present at OGS.
  • OGS delivered stronger 2025 adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth of approximately 13.7% year-over-year and guided for 2026 adjusted EPS in the $4.83–$4.95 range, reflecting robust rate-base expansion in high-growth Sun Belt states.
  • Both companies maintain investment-grade credit ratings, multi-decade dividend growth track records, and constructive regulatory environments, making them appealing to income-oriented investors.
  • Valuation diverges meaningfully: BKH trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and offers a higher dividend yield, while OGS commands a premium for its faster earnings growth trajectory and favorable regulatory jurisdictions.
  • Risk profiles differ — BKH faces merger execution risk, while OGS must navigate the long-term energy transition narrative around natural gas-only utilities.

Introduction

Investors searching for stable, dividend-paying utility stocks frequently encounter BKH and OGS — two mid-cap regulated utilities with compelling income profiles and defensive characteristics. Though both operate within the broader regulated utility sector, their business models, geographic footprints, and growth strategies diverge in important ways. BKH offers a diversified blend of electric and natural gas operations spanning eight Midwestern and Western states, while OGS is a pure-play natural gas local distribution company (LDC) concentrated in three Sun Belt states. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, strategic positioning, and how AI-powered analysis tools evaluate their relative attractiveness in the current market environment.

BKH Overview and Recent Performance

Black Hills Corporation (BKH), headquartered in Rapid City, South Dakota, is a diversified energy utility serving approximately 1.37 million customers through its electric and natural gas segments. The company operates across Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming, giving it significant geographic and regulatory diversification. In recent months, BKH has been one of the more event-driven names in the utility space. The company delivered full-year 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.10, landing at the midpoint of its guidance range and reflecting approximately 5% year-over-year growth. For 2026, management initiated adjusted EPS guidance of $4.25 to $4.45, targeting 6% growth at the midpoint.

The dominant narrative around BKH in recent months has been its announced tax-free, all-stock merger with NorthWestern Energy, a transaction expected to close in the second half of 2026. The merger would create a premier Midwest utility with enhanced scale and operational resilience. Simultaneously, the company completed its Ready Wyoming 260-mile electric transmission expansion project and continues advancing a data center load pipeline exceeding 3 GW — including 600 MW embedded in its five-year capital plan by 2030, supported by Microsoft's ongoing regional expansion and Meta's new AI data center in Wyoming. BKH also extended its dividend growth streak to 56 consecutive years, the second-longest in the electric and natural gas utility industry.

OGS Overview and Recent Performance

ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS), headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, is a 100% regulated natural gas utility and one of the largest gas-only LDCs in the United States. Through its three operating divisions — Kansas Gas Service, Oklahoma Natural Gas, and Texas Gas Service — the company serves more than 2.3 million customers and is included in the S&P MidCap 400 Index. In recent quarters, OGS has demonstrated strong operational execution and consistent earnings momentum. Full-year 2025 adjusted net income reached $271 million, or $4.48 per diluted share, representing a 13.7% increase over 2024 adjusted EPS of $3.94.

Looking ahead, OGS guided for 2026 adjusted EPS in the range of $4.83 to $4.95, implying continued above-peer growth driven by constructive regulatory outcomes and organic customer expansion. The company's Texas rate case resulted in a $14.4 million annual revenue increase approved by the Railroad Commission of Texas, coupled with the consolidation of Texas service areas into a single statewide division. OGS benefits from favorable demographic tailwinds, adding approximately 23,000 new residential customers annually across its three-state territory. Capital expenditures totaled approximately $760 million in 2025 and are expected to reach roughly $800 million in 2026, primarily directed toward system integrity and replacement projects. The company recently raised its quarterly dividend to $0.68 per share, continuing its commitment to shareholder returns.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where data-driven decision-making increasingly shapes financial markets, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers investors a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across every major sector — yet only a select group earns placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These featured bots are those best aligned with prevailing market conditions, each operating with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles. Performance metrics among the bots vary widely, with some achieving annualized returns that materially outpace benchmark indices, while others are optimized for consistency and lower drawdowns. Whether a trader prioritizes short-term momentum, swing trading, or longer-duration position strategies, the Trending AI Robots page provides a transparent, regularly updated view into which algorithms are currently demonstrating the strongest real-time results across their respective ticker universes.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing BKH and OGS, the most immediate structural difference is diversification. BKH generates revenue from both electric and natural gas utility operations — roughly a 40/60 split — which provides a natural hedge against fuel-specific regulatory or commodity risks. OGS, by contrast, operates as a pure-play gas LDC, making its earnings entirely dependent on natural gas distribution economics and the regulatory frameworks governing those operations.

On growth, the two companies present contrasting profiles. OGS currently exhibits faster organic EPS growth (13.7% adjusted growth in 2025, with 2026 guidance pointing to 5–7% long-term growth), driven by consistent customer additions in Texas and Oklahoma and a highly constructive regulatory compact. BKH is targeting the upper half of a 4–6% long-term EPS growth range, but its upside is amplified by a less conventional catalyst: the data center boom. The 3 GW pipeline — and the 600 MW already in the five-year plan — represents a structural demand driver that few peer utilities can match. However, BKH also carries merger execution risk, which introduces near-term uncertainty around integration costs, regulatory approvals, and financing.

From a valuation standpoint, BKH trades at a lower P/E multiple (approximately 18–19x versus OGS at roughly 19–20x) and offers a higher dividend yield — approximately 3.7% versus 3.2%. BKH also boasts a lower beta (approximately 0.75 versus 0.81), indicating slightly less sensitivity to broader market swings. On margin quality, OGS edges ahead with slightly superior operating margins and return on equity (ROE), a function of its pure-play focus and favorable regulatory jurisdictions. Both companies maintain solid investment-grade balance sheets: BKH holds Baa2/BBB+ ratings from Moody's and S&P, respectively, while OGS similarly operates with conservative leverage metrics appropriate for a regulated utility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, catalyst visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a nuanced preference between these two utility names. OGS currently demonstrates stronger near-term earnings momentum, a cleaner regulatory story, and the tailwind of population migration into its Sun Belt service territory — factors that algorithmic trend-following models tend to weight favorably. Its upward EPS trajectory, constructive Texas rate case outcome, and clarity of capital deployment make it a stable, high-visibility compounder. However, BKH offers a differentiated risk-reward proposition: the pending merger with NorthWestern Energy and the data center demand thesis introduce catalysts that could re-rate the stock meaningfully if executed successfully. The AI would likely recognize that BKH carries a wider distribution of potential outcomes — both upside and downside — while OGS presents a narrower, more predictable path. In the current environment, where visibility and consistency command a premium, the AI might lean toward OGS on a pure momentum and stability basis, but would closely monitor BKH for a catalyst-driven breakout as merger milestones and data center agreements materialize.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BKH vs. OGS commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKH is a StrongBuy and OGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (BKH: $75.29 vs. OGS: $80.53)
Brand notoriety: BKH and OGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKH: 73% vs. OGS: 47%
Market capitalization -- BKH: $5.73B vs. OGS: $5.05B
BKH [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $5.73B. OGS’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $5.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $6.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKH is a better buy in the long-term than OGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKH is a better buy in the short-term than OGS.

Price Growth

BKH (@Gas Distributors) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while OGS (@Gas Distributors) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKH is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

OGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (-0.29% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKH($5.73B) has a higher market cap than OGS($5.05B). BKH has higher P/E ratio than OGS: BKH (19.61) vs OGS (18.18). BKH YTD gains are higher at: 10.539 vs. OGS (5.956). BKH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 837M vs. OGS (783M). BKH has more cash in the bank: 23.6M vs. OGS (11.4M). OGS has less debt than BKH: OGS (3.38B) vs BKH (4.66B). OGS (2.32B) and BKH (2.29B) have equivalent revenues.
BKHOGSBKH / OGS
Capitalization5.73B5.05B113%
EBITDA837M783M107%
Gain YTD10.5395.956177%
P/E Ratio19.6118.18108%
Revenue2.29B2.32B98%
Total Cash23.6M11.4M207%
Total Debt4.66B3.38B138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKH vs OGS: Fundamental Ratings
BKH
OGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8841
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5764
SMR RATING
1..100
7979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OGS's Valuation (15) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as BKH (29) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that OGS’s stock grew similarly to BKH’s over the last 12 months.

BKH's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as OGS (64) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that BKH’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

BKH's SMR Rating (79) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as OGS (79) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that BKH’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

BKH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as OGS (51) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that BKH’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

BKH's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as OGS (45) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that BKH’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHOGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UGE18.970.40
+2.16%
ProShares Ultra Consumer Staples
ESUM29.990.08
+0.26%
Eventide Us Market ETF
VV339.850.17
+0.05%
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
EEMA115.06N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
EMXF57.35N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF

BKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKH has been closely correlated with D. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKH jumps, then D could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKH
1D Price
Change %
BKH100%
+0.25%
D - BKH
75%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
NWE - BKH
74%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
LNT - BKH
74%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
OGE - BKH
74%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
POR - BKH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
More