BKIMF
Price
$10.96
Change
+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
13.32B
MSBB
Price
$15.17
Change
-$0.08 (-0.52%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKIMF vs MSBB

Header iconBKIMF vs MSBB Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs MSBBBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$10.96
Change+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Volume$2.66K
Capitalization13.32B
Mercer Ban
Price$15.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.56M
BKIMF vs MSBB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. MSBB commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Buy and MSBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $10.96 vs. MSBB: $15.17)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and MSBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 100% vs. MSBB: 38%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $13.32B vs. MSBB: $15.56M
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.32B. MSBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMSBB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MSBB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than MSBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MSBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSBB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than MSBB($15.6M). MSBB has higher P/E ratio than BKIMF: MSBB (16.14) vs BKIMF (8.69). BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 37.000 vs. MSBB (8.357). MSBB has less debt than BKIMF: MSBB (11M) vs BKIMF (10.2B). BKIMF has higher revenues than MSBB: BKIMF (3.07B) vs MSBB (6.66M).
BKIMFMSBBBKIMF / MSBB
Capitalization13.3B15.6M85,256%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.0008.357443%
P/E Ratio8.6916.1454%
Revenue3.07B6.66M46,087%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.2B11M92,727%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFMSBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMSC22.130.10
+0.47%
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF
XBI90.290.39
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P Biotech ETF
STK31.770.05
+0.16%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
XBJL36.960.05
+0.13%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul
DUKZ25.20N/A
+0.01%
Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LYBC - BKIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
MSBB - BKIMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBB and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBB and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBB
1D Price
Change %
MSBB100%
N/A
FNWD - MSBB
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BKIMF - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCAP - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
NSTS - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More