BKR
Price
$45.62
Change
-$1.29 (-2.75%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
33.53B
52 days until earnings call
EFXT
Price
$8.97
Change
-$0.21 (-2.29%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
721.41M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BKR vs EFXT

Header iconBKR vs EFXT Comparison
Open Charts BKR vs EFXTBanner chart's image
Baker Hughes
Price$45.62
Change-$1.29 (-2.75%)
Volume$7.9M
Capitalization33.53B
Enerflex
Price$8.97
Change-$0.21 (-2.29%)
Volume$163.06K
Capitalization721.41M
BKR vs EFXT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKR vs. EFXT commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKR is a Hold and EFXT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BKR: $45.62 vs. EFXT: $8.97)
Brand notoriety: BKR and EFXT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKR: 114% vs. EFXT: 38%
Market capitalization -- BKR: $33.53B vs. EFXT: $721.41M
BKR [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $33.53B. EFXT’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $721.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEFXT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKR is a better buy in the long-term than EFXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFXT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the short-term than BKR.

Price Growth

BKR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKR is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.87% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKR($33.5B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($721M). BKR YTD gains are higher at: 11.756 vs. EFXT (-9.849). BKR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.96B vs. EFXT (358M). BKR has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. EFXT (141M). EFXT has less debt than BKR: EFXT (1.32B) vs BKR (6.02B). BKR has higher revenues than EFXT: BKR (25.5B) vs EFXT (3.16B).
BKREFXTBKR / EFXT
Capitalization33.5B721M4,646%
EBITDA3.96B358M1,106%
Gain YTD11.756-9.849-119%
P/E Ratio17.50N/A-
Revenue25.5B3.16B806%
Total Cash2.65B141M1,877%
Total Debt6.02B1.32B458%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKR vs EFXT: Fundamental Ratings
BKR
EFXT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1994
SMR RATING
1..100
4991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKR (58). This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKR’s over the last 12 months.

BKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (94). This means that BKR’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

BKR's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (91). This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

BKR's Price Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as EFXT (43). This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

BKR's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (100). This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKREFXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STKL6.98-0.07
-0.99%
SunOpta
GGG86.05-1.20
-1.38%
Graco
MNTS3.57-0.20
-5.31%
Momentus Inc
ACVA17.58-1.00
-5.41%
ACV Auctions
OBIO4.72-0.48
-9.23%
Orchestra BioMed Holdings

BKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKR has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKR jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKR
1D Price
Change %
BKR100%
-2.75%
NOV - BKR
72%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
HAL - BKR
71%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
SLB - BKR
71%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
CHX - BKR
67%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
FTI - BKR
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.43%
More

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with CESDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then CESDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
-2.29%
CESDF - EFXT
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
HAL - EFXT
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
LBRT - EFXT
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
AROC - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.05%
BKR - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
More