Advertisement
BKR vs SLB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. SLB N.V. (SLB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Baker Hughes (BKR) and SLB N.V. (SLB) are leading players in the oil and gas equipment and services sector, with comparable year-to-date returns near 24% as of mid-July 2026.
- BKR recently completed a $13.6 billion acquisition of Chart Industries, expanding its industrial and energy technology portfolio.
- SLB has pursued partnerships in AI-related infrastructure to address growing energy demands from data centers.
- BKR exhibits higher one-year total return (45.27%) compared to SLB (39.24%), alongside a slightly elevated beta.
- Both companies report strong profitability margins and analyst support, with average price targets well above recent closes.
- Market positioning reflects trade-offs between BKR’s acquisition-driven growth and SLB’s scale and dividend yield advantages.
Introduction
Baker Hughes (BKR) and SLB N.V. (SLB) represent two of the largest companies in the oil and gas equipment and services industry. Investors and traders often compare these stocks when evaluating exposure to energy sector dynamics, including commodity price trends, technological innovation, and capital allocation strategies. This analysis examines their business models, recent performance, and relative positioning to assist those seeking data-driven insights into sector peers.
BKR Overview and Recent Performance
Baker Hughes (BKR) provides technologies and services across the energy and industrial value chains, with segments focused on oilfield services and equipment as well as industrial and energy technology. In recent weeks, the stock has traded amid broader energy sector activity, closing at 55.95 on July 17, 2026, with a market capitalization of approximately 55.5 billion. Year-to-date performance reached 23.73%, outpacing the S&P 500. Recent market activity has been influenced by the completion of the $13.6 billion Chart Industries acquisition, which integrates new capabilities in gas technology and climate solutions. Sentiment has reflected both optimism over expanded scale and caution regarding integration execution.
SLB Overview and Recent Performance
SLB N.V. (SLB) delivers technology solutions for the energy industry through divisions including Digital & Integration, Reservoir Performance, Well Construction, and Production Systems. The stock closed at 46.99 on July 17, 2026, corresponding to a market capitalization of about 70.25 billion. Year-to-date returns stood at 23.80%, closely aligned with BKR and ahead of the S&P 500 benchmark. Recent developments include strategic moves toward AI infrastructure partnerships aimed at meeting data center energy needs. Performance in recent weeks has occurred against a backdrop of stable sector conditions and ongoing earnings expectations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker coverage, with statistics often highlighting win rates, drawdowns, and profitability ranges that appeal to diverse user preferences. The platform emphasizes transparency in bot statistics to support informed selection. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current options aligned with individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BKR and SLB operate similar business models centered on oilfield services yet differ in emphasis: BKR maintains a notable industrial and energy technology segment, while SLB focuses more exclusively on upstream and production technologies. Growth drivers for BKR include the recent Chart acquisition, potentially broadening revenue streams, whereas SLB has highlighted partnerships addressing AI-driven power demands. Recent momentum shows comparable year-to-date gains, though BKR posted a stronger one-year return. Risk factors include BKR’s higher beta of 0.96 versus SLB’s 0.73, indicating greater volatility sensitivity. Sector exposure remains aligned within energy services, with market sentiment supported by analyst targets exceeding current prices for both. Trade-offs center on BKR’s acquisition catalyst versus SLB’s larger scale and higher dividend yield.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Baker Hughes (BKR). The completed Chart Industries acquisition provides a concrete growth catalyst that may support stability, while both stocks exhibit positive analyst sentiment. SLB’s lower beta and scale offer defensive attributes that could appeal in more uncertain environments. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of available data rather than a definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKR is a StrongBuy and SLB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BKR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BKR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BKR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BKR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while SLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
BKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2026.
SLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.85% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| BKR | SLB | BKR / SLB | |
| Capitalization | 56.2B | 71.3B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 5.1B | 6.87B | 74% |
| Gain YTD | 25.172 | 25.593 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.08 | 21.00 | 86% |
| Revenue | 27.9B | 35.9B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 14.8B | 3.39B | 437% |
| Total Debt | 16.2B | 11.6B | 140% |
BKR | SLB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLB's Valuation (25) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as BKR (30) in the null industry. This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to BKR’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLB (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLB’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SLB (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SLB (56) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.
SLB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as BKR (21) in the null industry. This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to BKR’s over the last 12 months.
| BKR | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
SLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLB has been closely correlated with WFRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLB jumps, then WFRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| WFRD - SLB | 77% Closely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| HAL - SLB | 75% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| NOV - SLB | 71% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| BKR - SLB | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| INVX - SLB | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||