BLD
Price
$347.63
Change
+$2.46 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.94B
30 days until earnings call
FER
Price
$53.02
Change
+$0.07 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
37.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLD vs FER

Header iconBLD vs FER Comparison
Open Charts BLD vs FERBanner chart's image
TopBuild
Price$347.63
Change+$2.46 (+0.71%)
Volume$287.27K
Capitalization9.94B
Ferrovial S.E
Price$53.02
Change+$0.07 (+0.13%)
Volume$184.91K
Capitalization37.91B
BLD vs FER Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLD vs. FER commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a StrongBuy and FER is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLD: $347.63 vs. FER: $53.02)
Brand notoriety: BLD and FER are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLD: 79% vs. FER: 122%
Market capitalization -- BLD: $9.94B vs. FER: $37.91B
BLD [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $9.94B. FER’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $37.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFER’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FER’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLD is a better buy in the long-term than FER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FER’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLD is a better buy in the short-term than FER.

Price Growth

BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +8.32% price change this week, while FER (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +155.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

FER is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.84% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($37.9B) has a higher market cap than BLD($9.94B). BLD has higher P/E ratio than FER: BLD (17.62) vs FER (10.09). FER YTD gains are higher at: 26.148 vs. BLD (11.656). FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.54B vs. BLD (1.01B). FER has more cash in the bank: 3.64B vs. BLD (309M). BLD has less debt than FER: BLD (1.57B) vs FER (11.9B). FER has higher revenues than BLD: FER (9.15B) vs BLD (5.28B).
BLDFERBLD / FER
Capitalization9.94B37.9B26%
EBITDA1.01B4.54B22%
Gain YTD11.65626.14845%
P/E Ratio17.6210.09175%
Revenue5.28B9.15B58%
Total Cash309M3.64B8%
Total Debt1.57B11.9B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLD: Fundamental Ratings
BLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDFER
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNAV32.610.39
+1.20%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
MILN49.290.43
+0.88%
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
LRGE79.810.68
+0.86%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
JMUB49.51-0.02
-0.04%
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
DRAG24.80-0.36
-1.43%
Roundhill China Dragons ETF

BLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLD
1D Price
Change %
BLD100%
+0.71%
ACA - BLD
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
APG - BLD
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXPO - BLD
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
GVA - BLD
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ACM - BLD
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
More

FER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FER and GVA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FER and GVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FER
1D Price
Change %
FER100%
+0.13%
GVA - FER
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
MTZ - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
ACM - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
AMRC - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
APG - FER
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More