BLD
Price
$417.37
Change
-$8.98 (-2.11%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
11.74B
51 days until earnings call
FER
Price
$57.57
Change
+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
41.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLD vs FER

Header iconBLD vs FER Comparison
Open Charts BLD vs FERBanner chart's image
TopBuild
Price$417.37
Change-$8.98 (-2.11%)
Volume$166.11K
Capitalization11.74B
Ferrovial S.E
Price$57.57
Change+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Volume$398.66K
Capitalization41.14B
BLD vs FER Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLD vs. FER commentary
Sep 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a Hold and FER is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BLD: $417.37 vs. FER: $57.57)
Brand notoriety: BLD and FER are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLD: 44% vs. FER: 129%
Market capitalization -- BLD: $11.74B vs. FER: $41.14B
BLD [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $11.74B. FER’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $41.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFER’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLD is a better buy in the long-term than FER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FER’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FER’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FER is a better buy in the short-term than BLD.

Price Growth

BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while FER (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +353.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.19% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($41.1B) has a higher market cap than BLD($11.7B). BLD has higher P/E ratio than FER: BLD (20.60) vs FER (10.65). FER YTD gains are higher at: 36.974 vs. BLD (34.056). FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.59B vs. BLD (1.02B). FER has more cash in the bank: 2.84B vs. BLD (842M). BLD has less debt than FER: BLD (2.08B) vs FER (10.3B). FER has higher revenues than BLD: FER (9.35B) vs BLD (5.22B).
BLDFERBLD / FER
Capitalization11.7B41.1B28%
EBITDA1.02B4.59B22%
Gain YTD34.05636.97492%
P/E Ratio20.6010.65193%
Revenue5.22B9.35B56%
Total Cash842M2.84B30%
Total Debt2.08B10.3B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLD: Fundamental Ratings
BLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDFER
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QIS20.060.47
+2.40%
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
CPRA26.030.04
+0.15%
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Apr
AIRL34.54-0.06
-0.16%
Themes Airlines ETF
DLS80.21-0.47
-0.58%
WisdomTree International SmallCp Div ETF
KBA29.47-0.28
-0.94%
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF

BLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLD
1D Price
Change %
BLD100%
-2.11%
ACA - BLD
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.02%
ACM - BLD
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
EXPO - BLD
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
TPC - BLD
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
GVA - BLD
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
More

FER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FER has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FER jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FER
1D Price
Change %
FER100%
+0.51%
GVA - FER
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
STN - FER
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
MTZ - FER
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
ACM - FER
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
BLD - FER
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More