It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GVA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while GVA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.
BLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
GVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
BLD | GVA | BLD / GVA | |
Capitalization | 12.3B | 3.46B | 356% |
EBITDA | 1.04B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.401 | 61.770 | 6% |
P/E Ratio | 20.95 | 39.44 | 53% |
Revenue | 5.26B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 463M | 173M | 268% |
Total Debt | 1.6B | 820M | 195% |
BLD | GVA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLD's Valuation (75) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GVA (99) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
BLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GVA (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
BLD's SMR Rating (38) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (71) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
GVA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BLD (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that GVA’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
BLD's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (67) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
BLD | GVA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 11 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago73% | 5 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 2 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been loosely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GVA | 100% | +1.51% | ||
BLD - GVA | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
PRIM - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
NVEE - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
ACM - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
ACA - GVA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
More |