Investors tracking the construction and infrastructure sector have watched two very different growth stories unfold in recent years. FIX, representing Comfort Systems USA – a mechanical, electrical, and HVAC contracting powerhouse – has ridden the AI and data center boom to explosive revenue and earnings growth. GVA, or Granite Construction, has charted a steadier course tied to America's roads, bridges, and raw construction materials. Comparing these two stocks offers a window into contrasting investment philosophies: high-growth momentum versus disciplined infrastructure value creation. This comparison is relevant for traders evaluating sector rotation opportunities and for long-term investors assessing which type of construction exposure better suits their portfolio objectives.
Comfort Systems USA is a leading national provider of mechanical and electrical contracting services, with 190 locations across 142 cities. The company installs, maintains, and repairs heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, electrical, and fire protection systems – mostly for commercial, industrial, and institutional buildings. In recent years, FIX has emerged as a primary beneficiary of the data center construction super-cycle, as hyperscale cloud providers and AI companies have poured capital into new facilities requiring sophisticated cooling and electrical infrastructure.
FIX delivered extraordinary financial results for the full year 2025. Revenue climbed 30% to $9.10 billion, while net income surpassed $1 billion for the first time in company history. Fourth-quarter revenue alone reached $2.65 billion, a 42% year-over-year increase, and diluted EPS (earnings per share) of $9.37 more than doubled from the prior-year period. The company's backlog expanded to $11.94 billion by year-end 2025, approximately double where it started the year, reflecting unprecedented demand. In its most recent Q2 2026 earnings, FIX posted revenue of $3.27 billion and EPS of $12.53, a 92% year-over-year surge. The stock has delivered a one-year return exceeding 200%, though it has also pulled back roughly 16% from its 52-week high reached in May 2026, reflecting some profit-taking and valuation sensitivity among investors. Gross margins have expanded meaningfully, exceeding 25% in recent quarters, and free cash flow reached $1 billion in 2025 – giving management ample capacity for acquisitions, share repurchases, and dividend increases.
Granite Construction is one of the largest civil infrastructure contractors and construction materials producers in the United States. The company operates across two core segments: Construction, which handles large-scale transportation, water, and infrastructure projects, and Materials, which produces and sells aggregates (crushed stone, sand, and gravel) and asphalt used in both internal projects and external sales. Granite's vertically integrated model – controlling raw material supply for its own construction operations – has become a central pillar of its margin expansion strategy.
GVA's full-year 2025 results demonstrated broad-based improvement. Revenue rose 10% to $4.42 billion, while adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) jumped 31% to $527 million, lifting adjusted EBITDA margin to 11.9% from 10% in 2024. Adjusted net income reached $276 million, or $6.07 per diluted share. The company's CAP – its measure of future contracted revenue – reached a record $7 billion, up $1.7 billion year-over-year, with approximately 48% coming from higher-quality "best value" projects. The Materials segment was a standout performer, with cash gross profit margin improving from 19% in 2023 to 26% in 2025. Granite also completed several strategic acquisitions during 2025, expanding aggregate reserves to over 2.1 billion tons. For 2026, management guided revenue of $4.9–$5.1 billion and adjusted EBITDA margin of 12–13%. The stock has posted solid gains over the past year – rising approximately 40% – but trades well off its 52-week high near $162, reflecting the more measured pace of growth characteristic of the heavy civil sector.
For traders seeking to navigate the increasingly complex landscape of stocks like FIX and GVA, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers access to hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers across all market sectors. Only the most consistent and market-adaptive bots earn a spot in this curated section, where users can find strategies spanning ultra-short 5-minute cycles, 15-minute intraday models, and longer 60-minute swing-trading approaches. Performance metrics among featured bots have ranged from double-digit annualized returns to well over 100%, with some strategies posting win rates above 70% and profit factors exceeding 4.0 – meaning more than $4 earned for every $1 risked. Each robot operates with its own trading style, strategy logic, timeframe, and curated set of tickers, giving users the flexibility to match their risk tolerance and market outlook. Explore the full lineup at the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading in today's market conditions.
The most fundamental contrast between FIX and GVA lies in their end-market exposure. FIX thrives on private-sector capital expenditure cycles – particularly the technology industry's race to build out AI and cloud computing infrastructure. Data center work represented roughly 42% of FIX's revenue in 2025, up from 32% the prior year, making the company highly levered to one of the strongest secular growth trends in the economy. GVA, by contrast, derives the majority of its business from public-sector infrastructure spending – highways, bridges, water systems, and transportation projects funded by federal, state, and local governments. Only about half of the roughly $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) funding has been deployed to date, providing a multi-year runway, but the pace of disbursement remains subject to political and administrative timelines.
On financial scale and profitability, the divergence is stark. FIX's $9.10 billion in 2025 revenue was more than double GVA's $4.42 billion, and its $1.02 billion net income dwarfed GVA's $193 million. However, GVA's adjusted EBITDA margins of 11.9% and its upward trajectory toward 12–13% in 2026 demonstrate meaningful operational improvement. The Materials segment, with cash gross margins now at 26%, gives GVA a differentiated profitability engine that FIX does not possess – raw material self-supply is a structural moat in heavy civil construction. FIX, meanwhile, achieves margin expansion through scale, project selection discipline, and modular construction capabilities.
Valuation presents perhaps the sharpest trade-off. FIX trades at a trailing P/E of approximately 43 and an enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiple near 30, reflecting the market's willingness to pay a premium for AI-linked infrastructure growth. GVA trades at a trailing P/E of roughly 34 but a forward P/E near 19, with an EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to EBITDA) multiple around 12.5 – significantly cheaper on both an absolute and growth-adjusted basis. FIX's PEG ratio (P/E divided by growth rate) sits near 0.83, while GVA's is approximately 0.15, suggesting GVA is priced more attractively relative to its expected earnings growth.
Risk factors also diverge meaningfully. FIX faces concentration risk if the data center investment cycle cools or if hyperscale customers consolidate spending. Its premium multiple leaves limited room for disappointment. GVA's risks include weather disruptions that can shift revenue between quarters, M&A integration challenges as the company pursues additional acquisitions in 2026, and uncertainty about the next major federal infrastructure funding package once IIJA spending winds down. Both companies carry acquisition-related integration risk, though GVA has been more aggressive on this front, deploying $778 million on acquisitions in 2025 alone.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, revenue visibility, margin direction, and relative valuation, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely tilt in favor of FIX for trend-following and momentum-oriented strategies. The company's backlog trajectory – roughly doubling over 12 months – combined with explosive EPS growth and a dominant position in the secular data center buildout provides the kind of sustained earnings momentum that trend-detection models tend to favor. However, for value-oriented or mean-reversion strategies, GVA presents a compelling case: a lower valuation multiple, expanding margins driven by a structural shift toward materials vertical integration, and a record CAP backlog that provides multi-year revenue visibility. The probabilistic assessment is that FIX currently exhibits stronger relative momentum and trend consistency, while GVA offers a more balanced risk-reward profile for investors concerned with valuation discipline. Neither preference constitutes a definitive prediction, as market conditions, sector rotation dynamics, and company-specific execution will continue to shape the relative performance of both stocks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GVA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FIX (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.23% price change this week, while GVA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -4.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.76%.
FIX is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
GVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FIX | GVA | FIX / GVA | |
| Capitalization | 60.9B | 5.29B | 1,150% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 189M | 1,058% |
| Gain YTD | 85.501 | 5.075 | 1,685% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.57 | 32.12 | 133% |
| Revenue | 11.2B | 4.97B | 225% |
| Total Cash | 1.86B | 1.05B | 178% |
| Total Debt | 328M | 1.73B | 19% |
FIX | GVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GVA's Valuation (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIX (79). This means that GVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIX’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (26). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's SMR Rating (20) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVA (97). This means that FIX’s stock grew significantly faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (61). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (67). This means that FIX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
| FIX | GVA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 12 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIX has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FIX jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been loosely correlated with ROAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then ROAD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVA | 100% | +5.26% | ||
| ROAD - GVA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| FIX - GVA | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| MYRG - GVA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TPC - GVA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| DY - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
More | ||||