It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLGT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLGT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLFS (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +17.27% price change this week, while FLGT (@Medical Specialties) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.
BLFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
FLGT is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
BLFS | FLGT | BLFS / FLGT | |
Capitalization | 811M | 649M | 125% |
EBITDA | -45.24M | -49.15M | 92% |
Gain YTD | 56.246 | -41.370 | -136% |
P/E Ratio | 238.10 | 7.33 | 3,250% |
Revenue | 143M | 289M | 49% |
Total Cash | 51.7M | 424M | 12% |
Total Debt | 42.7M | 15.3M | 279% |
BLFS | FLGT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLGT's Valuation (51) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLFS (95) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that FLGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as FLGT (93) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's SMR Rating (93) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as FLGT (93) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLGT (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
FLGT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as BLFS (21) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that FLGT’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS | FLGT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 3 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TQAIX | 50.07 | 0.79 | +1.60% |
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq I | |||
NBMBX | 19.44 | 0.26 | +1.36% |
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv | |||
DASCX | 20.35 | 0.24 | +1.19% |
Dean Small Cap Value | |||
AIQQX | 22.86 | N/A | N/A |
Aristotle Value Equity I-2 | |||
WCPSX | 37.22 | -0.16 | -0.43% |
Communication Services UltraSectorProSvc |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFS has been loosely correlated with AZTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLFS jumps, then AZTA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLFS | 100% | +1.52% | ||
AZTA - BLFS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
VCYT - BLFS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
RGEN - BLFS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
MASS - BLFS | 47% Loosely correlated | +7.03% | ||
RVTY - BLFS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGT has been loosely correlated with NEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGT jumps, then NEO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGT | 100% | -1.91% | ||
NEO - FLGT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
NVST - FLGT | 48% Loosely correlated | +5.01% | ||
KIDS - FLGT | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.80% | ||
CERS - FLGT | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
BLFS - FLGT | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More |