BLFS
Price
$25.08
Change
+$0.18 (+0.72%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGEN
Price
$126.28
Change
-$0.29 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.15B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFS vs RGEN

BLFS vs RGEN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFS vs. RGEN commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFS is a StrongBuy and RGEN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BLFS: $24.89 vs. RGEN: $126.67)
Brand notoriety: BLFS and RGEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFS: 106% vs. RGEN: 69%
Market capitalization -- BLFS: $1.22B vs. RGEN: $7.15B
BLFS [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $1.22B. RGEN’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $7.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $142.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLFS is a better buy in the long-term than RGEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGEN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGEN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGEN is a better buy in the short-term than BLFS.

Price Growth

BLFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while RGEN (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

RGEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.31% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEN($7.15B) has a higher market cap than BLFS($1.22B). BLFS YTD gains are higher at: 2.936 vs. RGEN (-22.696). RGEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 176M vs. BLFS (-12.07M). RGEN has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. BLFS (81M). BLFS has less debt than RGEN: BLFS (14.9M) vs RGEN (688M). RGEN has higher revenues than BLFS: RGEN (763M) vs BLFS (102M).
BLFSRGENBLFS / RGEN
Capitalization1.22B7.15B17%
EBITDA-12.07M176M-7%
Gain YTD2.936-22.696-13%
P/E RatioN/A139.20-
Revenue102M763M13%
Total Cash81M785M10%
Total Debt14.9M688M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLFS vs RGEN: Fundamental Ratings
BLFS
RGEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGEN's Valuation (86) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BLFS (94) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RGEN’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.

RGEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BLFS (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RGEN’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.

RGEN's SMR Rating (90) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BLFS (92) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RGEN’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.

BLFS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RGEN (46) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

BLFS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGEN (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew significantly faster than RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFSRGEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDAUX35.03N/A
N/A
Baron Durable Advantage R6
JEPCX13.90N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income C
FECGX37.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index
LOFLX16.18N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
WSHCX64.34-0.30
-0.46%
American Funds Washington Mutual C

BLFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFS has been loosely correlated with RVTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLFS jumps, then RVTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFS
1D Price
Change %
BLFS100%
-4.42%
RVTY - BLFS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
A - BLFS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
RGEN - BLFS
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
XRAY - BLFS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
DHR - BLFS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More

RGEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGEN has been closely correlated with DHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGEN jumps, then DHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGEN
1D Price
Change %
RGEN100%
-4.05%
DHR - RGEN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
A - RGEN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
BIO - RGEN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
MTD - RGEN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
TMO - RGEN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More