BLFY
Price
$7.75
Change
-$0.05 (-0.64%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
161.02M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IBCP
Price
$30.35
Change
+$0.27 (+0.90%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
628M
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs IBCP

Header iconBLFY vs IBCP Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs IBCPBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$7.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.64%)
Volume$52.16K
Capitalization161.02M
Independent Bank
Price$30.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.90%)
Volume$124.1K
Capitalization628M
BLFY vs IBCP Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. IBCP commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and IBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $7.76 vs. IBCP: $30.35)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 105% vs. IBCP: 108%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $161.02M vs. IBCP: $628M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $161.02M. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $628M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBCP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBCP is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBCP is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.76% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBCP($628M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($161M). IBCP YTD gains are higher at: -9.953 vs. BLFY (-20.938). IBCP has less debt than BLFY: IBCP (181M) vs BLFY (367M). IBCP has higher revenues than BLFY: IBCP (216M) vs BLFY (42.6M).
BLFYIBCPBLFY / IBCP
Capitalization161M628M26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.938-9.953210%
P/E RatioN/A9.34-
Revenue42.6M216M20%
Total CashN/A74.4M-
Total Debt367M181M203%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
27
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIDX73.64N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Discovery
FVSKX55.50N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Strategies K
HTSCX9.66N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value C
SGHIX11.96N/A
N/A
Saturna Global High Income
RAZCX11.55N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-0.56%
FMBH - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
TCBK - BLFY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
FRBA - BLFY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
BHB - BLFY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
MCBS - BLFY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More

IBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBCP has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBCP jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBCP
1D Price
Change %
IBCP100%
+0.90%
BY - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
CTBI - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
MBWM - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BUSE - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
UVSP - IBCP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More