BLHEY
Price
$27.45
Change
-$0.35 (-1.26%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.71B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IAFNF
Price
$118.49
Change
-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLHEY vs IAFNF

Header iconBLHEY vs IAFNF Comparison
Open Charts BLHEY vs IAFNFBanner chart's image
Baloise Holdings AG
Price$27.45
Change-$0.35 (-1.26%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization11.71B
IA FINL
Price$118.49
Change-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Volume$885
Capitalization10.82B
BLHEY vs IAFNF Comparison Chart in %
BLHEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IAFNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHEY vs. IAFNF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHEY is a Hold and IAFNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BLHEY: $27.15 vs. IAFNF: $116.75)
Brand notoriety: BLHEY and IAFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHEY: 17% vs. IAFNF: 7%
Market capitalization -- BLHEY: $11.71B vs. IAFNF: $10.82B
BLHEY [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $11.71B. IAFNF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $10.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIAFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the long-term than BLHEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLHEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IAFNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLHEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IAFNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLHEY is a better buy in the short-term than IAFNF.

Price Growth

BLHEY (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.40% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLHEY($11.7B) has a higher market cap than IAFNF($10.8B). BLHEY has higher P/E ratio than IAFNF: BLHEY (22.29) vs IAFNF (14.27). BLHEY YTD gains are higher at: 55.891 vs. IAFNF (26.339). BLHEY has higher revenues than IAFNF: BLHEY (6.36B) vs IAFNF (4.95B).
BLHEYIAFNFBLHEY / IAFNF
Capitalization11.7B10.8B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.89126.339212%
P/E Ratio22.2914.27156%
Revenue6.36B4.95B129%
Total CashN/A2.21B-
Total DebtN/A1.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHEY vs IAFNF: Fundamental Ratings
BLHEY
IAFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
7375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6731
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLHEY's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as IAFNF (61). This means that BLHEY’s stock grew similarly to IAFNF’s over the last 12 months.

IAFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHEY (6). This means that IAFNF’s stock grew similarly to BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEY's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IAFNF (75). This means that BLHEY’s stock grew similarly to IAFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IAFNF (45). This means that BLHEY’s stock grew similarly to IAFNF’s over the last 12 months.

IAFNF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLHEY (67). This means that IAFNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLHEYIAFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLHEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IAFNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDZ38.820.35
+0.92%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bear 3X ETF
NBTR50.88N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
INTF35.91-0.01
-0.03%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
DSMC33.41-0.18
-0.53%
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF
MDIV15.71-0.09
-0.60%
Multi-Asset Diversified Income ETF

BLHEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHEY and BLHEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHEY and BLHEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHEY
1D Price
Change %
BLHEY100%
-1.09%
BLHEF - BLHEY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - BLHEY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - BLHEY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
GIVSY - BLHEY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAFNF - BLHEY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and BBSEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and BBSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
-1.47%
BBSEY - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
AXAHY - IAFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
AXAHF - IAFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
MPFRF - IAFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHEY - IAFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More