BLK
Price
$1149.31
Change
+$21.38 (+1.90%)
Updated
Aug 12, 12:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
174.66B
59 days until earnings call
FHI
Price
$51.90
Change
+$0.33 (+0.64%)
Updated
Aug 12, 10:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs FHI

Header iconBLK vs FHI Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs FHIBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1149.31
Change+$21.38 (+1.90%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization174.66B
Federated Hermes
Price$51.90
Change+$0.33 (+0.64%)
Volume$692
Capitalization4B
BLK vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. FHI commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and FHI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1127.93 vs. FHI: $51.57)
Brand notoriety: BLK and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 100% vs. FHI: 83%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $174.66B vs. FHI: $4B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $174.66B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than BLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than FHI.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.94% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($175B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than FHI: BLK (27.26) vs FHI (11.43). FHI YTD gains are higher at: 28.319 vs. BLK (11.217). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.37B vs. FHI (537M). FHI has less debt than BLK: FHI (459M) vs BLK (14.3B). BLK has higher revenues than FHI: BLK (21B) vs FHI (1.68B).
BLKFHIBLK / FHI
Capitalization175B4B4,375%
EBITDA9.37B537M1,745%
Gain YTD11.21728.31940%
P/E Ratio27.2611.43238%
Revenue21B1.68B1,249%
Total Cash9.71BN/A-
Total Debt14.3B459M3,115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs FHI: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2710
SMR RATING
1..100
5629
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1875

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHI's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (27) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (40) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (46) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XTRE49.600.01
+0.02%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
ROPE25.52N/A
N/A
Coastal Compass 100 ETF
DWMF31.73-0.01
-0.03%
WisdomTree International Mltfctr
DFAT54.51-0.07
-0.13%
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
KRMA41.26-0.15
-0.37%
Global X Conscious Companies ETF

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
+0.62%
JHG - FHI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
TROW - FHI
69%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
AMG - FHI
69%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
BLK - FHI
67%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
AMP - FHI
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More