BLK
Price
$990.74
Change
-$28.22 (-2.77%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.45B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHG
Price
$16.68
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jun 3, 03:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
151.9M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs WHG

Header iconBLK vs WHG Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs WHGBanner chart's image
BLK vs WHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. WHG commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Hold and WHG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BLK: $1018.96 vs. WHG: $16.66)
Brand notoriety: BLK and WHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 107% vs. WHG: 69%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $158.45B vs. WHG: $151.9M
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $158.45B. WHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $151.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $158.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than WHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLK and WHG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.42% price change this week, while WHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

WHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.33% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($158B) has a higher market cap than WHG($152M). BLK has higher P/E ratio than WHG: BLK (25.65) vs WHG (20.07). WHG YTD gains are higher at: -1.450 vs. BLK (-4.270). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.6B vs. WHG (7.7M). WHG has less debt than BLK: WHG (10M) vs BLK (15B). BLK has higher revenues than WHG: BLK (25.6B) vs WHG (99.5M).
BLKWHGBLK / WHG
Capitalization158B152M103,947%
EBITDA10.6B7.7M137,716%
Gain YTD-4.270-1.450295%
P/E Ratio25.6520.07128%
Revenue25.6B99.5M25,729%
Total Cash13.1BN/A-
Total Debt15B10M150,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs WHG: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
WHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1613
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6086
SMR RATING
1..100
6684
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHG's Valuation (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (71) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that WHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WHG (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to WHG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (66) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WHG (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to WHG’s over the last 12 months.

WHG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BLK (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that WHG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHG (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKWHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMUS188.832.09
+1.12%
T-Mobile US
MRTN17.50-0.04
-0.26%
Marten Transport Ltd
AWI152.84-2.33
-1.50%
Armstrong World Industries
HCKT11.53-0.52
-4.35%
Hackett Group
MDBH3.26-0.24
-6.82%
MDB Capital Holdings LLC

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-0.17%
PFG - BLK
70%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
BX - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
STT - BLK
67%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
KKR - BLK
66%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CG - BLK
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
More

WHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHG has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHG
1D Price
Change %
WHG100%
+4.06%
APAM - WHG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
BLK - WHG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
FHI - WHG
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
BEN - WHG
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
CNS - WHG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More