BLMC
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OILCF
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
638.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMC vs OILCF

Header iconBLMC vs OILCF Comparison
Open Charts BLMC vs OILCFBanner chart's image
Biloxi Marsh Lands
Price$1.88
Change+$0.03 (+1.62%)
Volume$750
CapitalizationN/A
Permex Petroleum
Price$4.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$260
Capitalization638.5M
BLMC vs OILCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMC vs. OILCF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMC is a Buy and OILCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMC: $1.88 vs. OILCF: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: BLMC and OILCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMC: 68% vs. OILCF: 34%
Market capitalization -- BLMC: $0 vs. OILCF: $638.5M
BLMC [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $0. OILCF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $638.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOILCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OILCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OILCF is a better buy in the long-term than BLMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OILCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OILCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMC is a better buy in the short-term than OILCF.

Price Growth

BLMC (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while OILCF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-2.16% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OILCF YTD gains are higher at: 59.363 vs. BLMC (-51.484).
BLMCOILCFBLMC / OILCF
CapitalizationN/A639M-
EBITDAN/A-738.22K-
Gain YTD-51.48459.363-87%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A277K-
Total CashN/A5.37M-
Total DebtN/A120K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMC vs OILCF: Fundamental Ratings
BLMC
OILCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3841
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OILCF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMC (98). This means that OILCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMC’s over the last 12 months.

OILCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMC (100). This means that OILCF’s stock grew similarly to BLMC’s over the last 12 months.

OILCF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMC (100). This means that OILCF’s stock grew similarly to BLMC’s over the last 12 months.

OILCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMC (89). This means that OILCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMC’s over the last 12 months.

BLMC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OILCF (100). This means that BLMC’s stock grew significantly faster than OILCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMCOILCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COUR12.700.52
+4.27%
Coursera
OCFT7.380.08
+1.10%
OneConnect Financial Technology Co Ltd
EXE101.650.61
+0.60%
Expand Energy Corporation
ZIMV18.82-0.04
-0.21%
ZimVie
XRTX0.74-0.02
-3.26%
XORTX Therapeutics

BLMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMC has been loosely correlated with REPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMC jumps, then REPX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMC
1D Price
Change %
BLMC100%
+1.62%
REPX - BLMC
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
TTYP - BLMC
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WLTNF - BLMC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DTNOF - BLMC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DALXF - BLMC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

OILCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OILCF and HLEGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OILCF and HLEGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OILCF
1D Price
Change %
OILCF100%
N/A
HLEGF - OILCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMC - OILCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
TXO - OILCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
CECAF - OILCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEEVF - OILCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More