BLMN
Price
$9.67
Change
+$1.06 (+12.31%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
733.23M
24 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$138.41
Change
-$2.19 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.66B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs SHAK

Header iconBLMN vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$9.67
Change+$1.06 (+12.31%)
Volume$151.74K
Capitalization733.23M
Shake Shack
Price$138.41
Change-$2.19 (-1.56%)
Volume$7.16K
Capitalization5.66B
BLMN vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. SHAK commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and SHAK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $8.61 vs. SHAK: $140.60)
Brand notoriety: BLMN: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 74% vs. SHAK: 69%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $733.23M vs. SHAK: $5.66B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $733.23M. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.18% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +3.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($5.66B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($733M). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: SHAK (484.83) vs BLMN (9.69). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: 8.320 vs. BLMN (-27.031). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 303M vs. SHAK (125M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. BLMN (57.7M). SHAK has less debt than BLMN: SHAK (824M) vs BLMN (2.18B). BLMN has higher revenues than SHAK: BLMN (3.93B) vs SHAK (1.28B).
BLMNSHAKBLMN / SHAK
Capitalization733M5.66B13%
EBITDA303M125M242%
Gain YTD-27.0318.320-325%
P/E Ratio9.69484.832%
Revenue3.93B1.28B306%
Total Cash57.7M313M18%
Total Debt2.18B824M264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
9086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
984
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (98). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (90). This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (58). This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (98). This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPA10.790.08
+0.75%
Blackrock Muniyield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
IBDX25.280.06
+0.26%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
GJAN39.970.10
+0.25%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jan
IBIF26.410.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term Tips ETF
DFAT53.96-0.01
-0.02%
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-0.58%
DIN - BLMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CBRL - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CAKE - BLMN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
BJRI - BLMN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
DRI - BLMN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More