BLND vs CDTAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLND is a Hold and CDTAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDTAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CDTAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDTAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CDTAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLND (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while CDTAF (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLND is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BLND | CDTAF | BLND / CDTAF | |
| Capitalization | 819M | 6.68M | 12,268% |
| EBITDA | -143.21M | -2.62M | 5,466% |
| Gain YTD | 97.647 | -4.318 | -2,261% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 157M | 1.97M | 7,982% |
| Total Cash | 137M | 688K | 19,913% |
| Total Debt | 150M | 986K | 15,213% |
CDTAF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLND | CDTAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 24 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ANDIX | 14.26 | -0.04 | -0.28% |
| AQR International Defensive Style I | |||
| TAVFX | 58.36 | -0.20 | -0.34% |
| Third Avenue Value Instl | |||
| TRPBX | 25.50 | -0.09 | -0.35% |
| T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Allc Inv | |||
| LKSMX | 11.88 | -0.12 | -1.00% |
| LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional | |||
| PRSVX | 54.88 | -0.74 | -1.33% |
| T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value | |||
BLND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLND has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLND jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLND | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| COIN - BLND | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| CLSK - BLND | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| COMP - BLND | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| HOOD - BLND | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.63% | ||
| TTD - BLND | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||
CDTAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTAF and BLND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTAF and BLND's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDTAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTAF | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| BLND - CDTAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| CLRI - CDTAF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLOQ - CDTAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -7.02% | ||
| BYSD - CDTAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -13.76% | ||
| CMPD - CDTAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -12.64% | ||
More | ||||