Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) both target the expanding blockchain, cryptocurrency, and digital payments sectors. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products but instead represent alternative strategies for gaining exposure to companies involved in distributed ledger technology and related financial infrastructure. Investors evaluating thematic opportunities in digital assets may compare the two to assess differences in management style, cost, and holdings construction within a rapidly evolving industry.
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in January 2018. The fund seeks total return by investing in global equities of companies developing or utilizing blockchain technology, with allocations split between core holdings directly engaged in data-sharing technologies and secondary holdings that partner with or invest in such firms. It typically holds around 53 securities. Top holdings often include firms such as Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR), Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), TeraWulf Inc. (WULF), Core Scientific Inc. (CORZ), and Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY). Sector exposure centers on financial services and technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.70%. As an active thematic product, it employs discretionary rebalancing based on portfolio manager insights rather than a fixed index.
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in April 2022 that tracks the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index. The fund invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities and depositary receipts of companies engaged in cryptocurrency activities, blockchain technology, and digital payments processing. It generally holds approximately 62 securities. Prominent holdings frequently feature Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN), IREN Ltd. (IREN), Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), and other miners alongside payments-related firms. Sector allocations emphasize financial services and technology. The expense ratio is 0.39%. The strategy follows systematic index rules with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the benchmark.
The blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors continue to evolve amid ongoing regulatory clarity efforts, institutional adoption of digital assets, and integration of blockchain into traditional finance. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations and capital flows into risk assets influence sector momentum. Digital payments infrastructure benefits from broader e-commerce growth and shifts toward decentralized finance applications. Risks include regulatory changes, technological disruptions, and sensitivity to cryptocurrency price cycles. Capital allocation within the industry reflects both innovation in mining operations and expansion of exchange and payments platforms.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have displayed sensitivity to cryptocurrency valuations and blockchain adoption trends. Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has benefited from active positioning across miners and infrastructure providers during periods of sector rotation. Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has offered exposure aligned with its index, capturing movements in leading crypto exchanges and payments companies. Relative volatility remains elevated for both due to concentration in high-beta holdings. FDIG’s lower expense ratio supports more efficient long-term compounding in stable environments, while BLOK’s active approach may provide differentiation during specific thematic shifts.
AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.
Tickeron’s AI would likely favor Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) at present due to its lower expense ratio, rules-based index methodology, and balanced exposure to both cryptocurrency infrastructure and digital payments companies. The passive structure offers cost efficiency and transparent positioning that aligns with observable sector momentum while mitigating active management risks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BLOK | FDIG | BLOK / FDIG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.765 | 17.501 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 304M | 413% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.39 | 179% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 79.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 0.99 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
| BLOK | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLOK has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLOK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLOK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOK | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| CLSK - BLOK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| RIOT - BLOK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| HUT - BLOK | 81% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| GLXY - BLOK | 81% Closely correlated | -5.34% | ||
| MARA - BLOK | 78% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDIG has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDIG jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDIG | 100% | -1.95% | ||
| CLSK - FDIG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| RIOT - FDIG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| HUT - FDIG | 83% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| CIFR - FDIG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| MARA - FDIG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||