Ad is loading...
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$10.62
Change+$0.16 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.63M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$49.72
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. BLRCX (119M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs BLRCX (1.41). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.76 vs. CSFZX (2.46). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.10 vs. BLRCX (11.11).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.84 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.426 | -2.605 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 1.91B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.79 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 2.46 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.09 | -14.25 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.11 | 24.10 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.67 | 28.29 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...