Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.93M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.91
Change+$0.21 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. BLRCX (113M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.67) vs BLRCX (1.36). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. CSFZX (10.78). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.74 vs. BLRCX (18.17).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.304 | 7.561 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 1.99B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 10.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.66 | 15.42 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 31.74 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.90 | 47.83 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement