Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$12.16
Change+$0.07 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.09M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$56.55
Change+$0.25 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. BLRCX (119M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.80) vs BLRCX (1.17). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX (3.71) and CSFZX (3.55) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.06 vs. BLRCX (24.02).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.950 | 12.091 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 2.08B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 2.80 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.71 | 3.55 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 36.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.02 | 31.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.64 | 49.14 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement