Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.46M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. BLRCX (118M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.89) vs BLRCX (1.59). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. BLRCX (8.32). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.54 vs. BLRCX (22.66).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.190 | 9.105 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 2.01B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 9.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.28 | 10.71 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.66 | 36.54 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.30 | 49.12 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement