Ad is loading...
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.63M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. BLRCX (153M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.91) vs BLRCX (1.60). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (10 years). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. BLRCX (5.45). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. BLRCX (-12.18).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.181 | 0.509 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 1.75B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.91 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 6.04 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.61 | -12.34 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.18 | 2.34 | -521% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.99 | 34.75 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...