Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.35M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.74
Change-$0.21 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. BLRCX (111M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.74) vs BLRCX (1.38). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. CSFZX (6.34). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.14 vs. BLRCX (25.36).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.939 | 3.310 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 1.94B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 2.74 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 6.34 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.40 | 2.27 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.36 | 39.14 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.18 | 37.06 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers