Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.84
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.34M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.41
Change+$0.51 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRCX (117M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.82) vs BLRCX (1.55). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.95 vs. BLRCX (-1.12). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. BLRCX (25.67).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.656 | 10.319 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 2.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | -0.95 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.57 | 32.77 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.67 | 32.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.35 | 58.35 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement