Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.81
Change-$0.07 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.29M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.70
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRCX (116M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.84) vs BLRCX (1.18). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. CSFZX (2.55). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.37 vs. BLRCX (11.71).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.023 | 8.906 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 2.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 2.55 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 20.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.71 | 19.37 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.16 | 48.09 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers