BLSFY
Price
$73.33
Change
-$1.43 (-1.91%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.52B
CLF
Price
$12.34
Change
+$0.27 (+2.24%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.97B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLSFY vs CLF

Header iconBLSFY vs CLF Comparison
Open Charts BLSFY vs CLFBanner chart's image
Bluescope Steel
Price$73.33
Change-$1.43 (-1.91%)
Volume$792
Capitalization6.52B
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$12.34
Change+$0.27 (+2.24%)
Volume$14.9K
Capitalization5.97B
BLSFY vs CLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLSFY vs. CLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSFY is a Hold and CLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BLSFY: $73.32 vs. CLF: $12.07)
Brand notoriety: BLSFY: Not notable vs. CLF: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLSFY: 22% vs. CLF: 128%
Market capitalization -- BLSFY: $6.52B vs. CLF: $5.97B
BLSFY [@Steel] is valued at $6.52B. CLF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $5.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $30.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLSFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLSFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLSFY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLSFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLSFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than BLSFY.

Price Growth

BLSFY (@Steel) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while CLF (@Steel) price change was +5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.14% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLSFY($6.52B) has a higher market cap than CLF($5.97B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than BLSFY: CLF (145.67) vs BLSFY (132.13). CLF YTD gains are higher at: 28.404 vs. BLSFY (25.446). BLSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 994M vs. CLF (-430M). CLF has higher revenues than BLSFY: CLF (18.5B) vs BLSFY (16.3B).
BLSFYCLFBLSFY / CLF
Capitalization6.52B5.97B109%
EBITDA994M-430M-231%
Gain YTD25.44628.40490%
P/E Ratio132.13145.6791%
Revenue16.3B18.5B88%
Total CashN/A61M-
Total DebtN/A7.73B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLSFY vs CLF: Fundamental Ratings
BLSFY
CLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4282
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLSFY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (90) in the Steel industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (82) in the Steel industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (96) in the Steel industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Steel industry is in the same range as BLSFY (54) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (3) in the Steel industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLSFYCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORX11.350.13
+1.16%
2x Corn ETF
PMMY25.54N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
MDLV27.95-0.02
-0.07%
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
OUSA55.86-0.25
-0.44%
ALPS O'Shares US Quality Div ETF
IVAL30.20-0.24
-0.80%
Alpha Architect Intl Quant Val ETF

BLSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLSFY and CLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLSFY and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFY
1D Price
Change %
BLSFY100%
-1.91%
CLF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
FEEXF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFZF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
NUE - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
CMC - BLSFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More