Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs CPCLX
BLUEX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs CPCLX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$40.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.65M
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.48
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
BLUEX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. CPCLX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Buy and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. BLUEX (101M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than BLUEX: CPCLX (2.82) vs BLUEX (0.28). BLUEX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BLUEX (35 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). BLUEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPCLX: BLUEX (2000) vs CPCLX (2500). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. BLUEX (4.09). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 54.53 vs. BLUEX (-29.94).
| BLUEX | CPCLX | BLUEX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 3.19 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 3.19 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.685 | 8.736 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 1.14B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 2.82 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 5.44 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.08 | 25.60 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.94 | 54.53 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement