Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs CPCLX
BLUEX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs CPCLX
BLUEX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. CPCLX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. BLUEX (89.7M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than BLUEX: CPCLX (0.51) vs BLUEX (0.32). BLUEX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BLUEX (36 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). CPCLX (3.05) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.25). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. BLUEX (30.00). BLUEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPCLX: BLUEX (2000) vs CPCLX (2500). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.05 vs. BLUEX (-1.25). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.88 vs. BLUEX (-2.96).
| BLUEX | CPCLX | BLUEX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 3.05 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 3.05 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | 6.433 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.7M | 1.12B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.25 | 0.05 | -2,618% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.78 | 18.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | 21.88 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.39 | 69.15 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement