Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs RGAFX
BLUEX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs RGAFX
BLUEX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BLUEX (86.7M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than BLUEX: RGAFX (0.46) vs BLUEX (0.31). BLUEX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: BLUEX (36 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). BLUEX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BLUEX (30.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLUEX: RGAFX (250) vs BLUEX (2000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.45 vs. BLUEX (-3.87). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.37 vs. BLUEX (-5.99).
| BLUEX | RGAFX | BLUEX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.34 | 344% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.34 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.715 | 11.751 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.46 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.87 | 1.45 | -267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.40 | 54.42 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.99 | 18.37 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.53 | 110.23 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement