Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs RGAHX
BLUEX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs RGAHX
BLUEX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BLUEX (86.3M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BLUEX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BLUEX (0.33). BLUEX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BLUEX (36 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BLUEX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BLUEX (30.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLUEX: RGAHX (250) vs BLUEX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. BLUEX (-6.49). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. BLUEX (-8.00).
| BLUEX | RGAHX | BLUEX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.44 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.036 | 4.758 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.3M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.49 | 0.41 | -1,582% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.94 | 36.85 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.00 | 12.16 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.56 | 98.65 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement