BMA
Price
$94.32
Change
+$1.38 (+1.48%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
88 days until earnings call
GGAL
Price
$62.86
Change
+$0.53 (+0.85%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMA vs GGAL

Header iconBMA vs GGAL Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs GGALBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$94.32
Change+$1.38 (+1.48%)
Volume$194.16K
Capitalization3.14B
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA
Price$62.86
Change+$0.53 (+0.85%)
Volume$823.05K
Capitalization4.87B
BMA vs GGAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. GGAL commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a Buy and GGAL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BMA: $94.32 vs. GGAL: $62.86)
Brand notoriety: BMA and GGAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 58% vs. GGAL: 63%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.14B vs. GGAL: $4.87B
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. GGAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMA and GGAL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GGAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than GGAL.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

GGAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGAL($4.87B) has a higher market cap than BMA($3.14B). BMA has higher P/E ratio than GGAL: BMA (89.76) vs GGAL (58.02). GGAL YTD gains are higher at: 0.866 vs. BMA (-2.522). GGAL has higher revenues than BMA: GGAL (693B) vs BMA (573B).
BMAGGALBMA / GGAL
Capitalization3.14B4.87B65%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.5220.866-291%
P/E Ratio89.7658.02155%
Revenue573B693B83%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs GGAL: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
GGAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2416
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMA's Valuation (89) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GGAL (89). This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (24). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100). This means that GGAL’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (44). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGAL (93). This means that BMA’s stock grew significantly faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMAGGAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVRFX13.97N/A
N/A
Pioneer Disciplined Value R
GSDPX46.33N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq P
QSMNX16.43-0.04
-0.24%
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
FEEFX82.94-0.28
-0.34%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-3
HMVAX14.73-0.09
-0.61%
Hartford MidCap Value A

GGAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAL
1D Price
Change %
GGAL100%
+0.85%
BMA - GGAL
91%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
BBAR - GGAL
91%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
SUPV - GGAL
91%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
BAP - GGAL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CIB - GGAL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More