BMA
Price
$74.61
Change
-$2.14 (-2.79%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
47 days until earnings call
SUPV
Price
$12.51
Change
-$0.74 (-5.58%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
678.03M
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BMA vs SUPV

Header iconBMA vs SUPV Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs SUPVBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$74.61
Change-$2.14 (-2.79%)
Volume$716.96K
Capitalization3.14B
Grupo Supervielle SA
Price$12.51
Change-$0.74 (-5.58%)
Volume$779.7K
Capitalization678.03M
BMA vs SUPV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. SUPV commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a Hold and SUPV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BMA: $74.61 vs. SUPV: $12.51)
Brand notoriety: BMA and SUPV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 223% vs. SUPV: 78%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.14B vs. SUPV: $678.03M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. SUPV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $678.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUPV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SUPV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUPV is a better buy in the long-term than BMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SUPV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than SUPV.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.94% price change this week, while SUPV (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

SUPV is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($3.14B) has a higher market cap than SUPV($678M). BMA has higher P/E ratio than SUPV: BMA (89.76) vs SUPV (20.40). SUPV YTD gains are higher at: -17.207 vs. BMA (-22.892). BMA has higher revenues than SUPV: BMA (573B) vs SUPV (146B).
BMASUPVBMA / SUPV
Capitalization3.14B678M463%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-22.892-17.207133%
P/E Ratio89.7620.40440%
Revenue573B146B392%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A22.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs SUPV: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
SUPV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2521
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMA's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (60) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (25) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMASUPV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDCX14.08N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery C
DHSCX20.66N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Small Cap Inv
FZAIX49.94N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Discv Z
DIVGX16.76N/A
N/A
Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Instl
THGIX23.42-0.39
-1.64%
Thornburg International Growth R6

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
-2.79%
GGAL - BMA
91%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
SUPV - BMA
90%
Closely correlated
-5.58%
BBAR - BMA
89%
Closely correlated
-3.56%
SBNY - BMA
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
CIB - BMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

SUPV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUPV
1D Price
Change %
SUPV100%
-5.58%
BBAR - SUPV
90%
Closely correlated
-3.56%
BMA - SUPV
90%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
GGAL - SUPV
90%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
SBNY - SUPV
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
CIB - SUPV
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More