Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCKX vs RGAHX
BMCKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BMCKX vs RGAHX
BMCKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCKX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BMCKX (1.97B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BMCKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BMCKX (0.00). BMCKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BMCKX (9 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BMCKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCKX: RGAHX (250) vs BMCKX (5000000). BMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. RGAHX (0.18). BMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 26.13 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| BMCKX | RGAHX | BMCKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.44 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.44 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.461 | 9.200 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | 0.18 | 3,660% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.67 | 43.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.13 | 13.78 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement