BMCLF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
GELYF
Price
$2.46
Change
-$0.02 (-0.81%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
Capitalization
25.79B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMCLF vs GELYF

Header iconBMCLF vs GELYF Comparison
Open Charts BMCLF vs GELYFBanner chart's image
Baic Mtr
Price$0.25
Change-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.1B
Geely Automobile Holdings
Price$2.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.81%)
Volume$12.57K
Capitalization25.79B
BMCLF vs GELYF Comparison Chart in %
BMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GELYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMCLF vs. GELYF commentary
Oct 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCLF is a Hold and GELYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BMCLF: $0.25 vs. GELYF: $2.46)
Brand notoriety: BMCLF and GELYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMCLF: 23% vs. GELYF: 30%
Market capitalization -- BMCLF: $2.1B vs. GELYF: $25.79B
BMCLF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.1B. GELYF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $25.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGELYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GELYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GELYF is a better buy in the long-term than BMCLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMCLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GELYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMCLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GELYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GELYF is a better buy in the short-term than BMCLF.

Price Growth

BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -8.37% price change this week, while GELYF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.35% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GELYF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than BMCLF($2.11B). BMCLF has higher P/E ratio than GELYF: BMCLF (17.59) vs GELYF (11.91). GELYF YTD gains are higher at: 30.423 vs. BMCLF (-19.284).
BMCLFGELYFBMCLF / GELYF
Capitalization2.11B25.8B8%
EBITDAN/A19.1B-
Gain YTD-19.28430.423-63%
P/E Ratio17.5911.91148%
RevenueN/A272B-
Total CashN/A53.2B-
Total DebtN/A52.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMCLF vs GELYF: Fundamental Ratings
BMCLF
GELYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
7815
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMCLF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GELYF (36). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GELYF’s over the last 12 months.

GELYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (100). This means that GELYF’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

GELYF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMCLF (78). This means that GELYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

GELYF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (60). This means that GELYF’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as GELYF (20). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to GELYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMCLFGELYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GELYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCT.X0.000322N/A
+0.02%
TokenClub cryptocurrency
CTSI.X0.053975-0.000948
-1.73%
Cartesi cryptocurrency
QUICK.X18.926075-0.555557
-2.85%
QuickSwap [Old] cryptocurrency
ORDI.X5.108738-0.183493
-3.47%
ORDI cryptocurrency
STX.X0.427167-0.015424
-3.48%
Stacks cryptocurrency

BMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMCLF and BYDDY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMCLF and BYDDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMCLF
1D Price
Change %
BMCLF100%
N/A
BYDDY - BMCLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
GELYF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BYDDF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
NIU - BMCLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
LI - BMCLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More