BMCLF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
GELYY
Price
$38.28
Change
+$1.26 (+3.40%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMCLF vs GELYY

Header iconBMCLF vs GELYY Comparison
Open Charts BMCLF vs GELYYBanner chart's image
Baic Mtr
Price$0.28
Change+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
Geely Automobile Holdings
Price$38.28
Change+$1.26 (+3.40%)
Volume$12.45K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BMCLF vs GELYY Comparison Chart
Loading...
GELYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BMCLF vs. GELYY commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCLF is a Hold and GELYY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (BMCLF: $0.28 vs. GELYY: $38.28)
Brand notoriety: BMCLF and GELYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMCLF: 142% vs. GELYY: 57%
Market capitalization -- BMCLF: $2.22B vs. GELYY: $14.52B
BMCLF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.22B. GELYY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $14.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $34.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMCLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGELYY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GELYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GELYY is a better buy in the long-term than BMCLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GELYY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GELYY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +5.01% price change this week, while GELYY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-2.23% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GELYY($14.5B) has a higher market cap than BMCLF($2.22B). GELYY has higher P/E ratio than BMCLF: GELYY (19.76) vs BMCLF (3.79). GELYY YTD gains are higher at: 78.829 vs. BMCLF (0.269). BMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.2B vs. GELYY (13.6B). BMCLF has higher revenues than GELYY: BMCLF (176B) vs GELYY (148B).
BMCLFGELYYBMCLF / GELYY
Capitalization2.22B14.5B15%
EBITDA33.2B13.6B244%
Gain YTD0.26978.8290%
P/E Ratio3.7919.7619%
Revenue176B148B119%
Total Cash41BN/A-
Total Debt22.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMCLF vs GELYY: Fundamental Ratings
BMCLF
GELYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9779
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
7711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMCLF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GELYY (38). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to GELYY’s over the last 12 months.

GELYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (100). This means that GELYY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

GELYY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMCLF (77). This means that GELYY’s stock grew significantly faster than BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

GELYY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (52). This means that GELYY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GELYY (92). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GELYY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GELYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GELYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBPLX31.230.31
+1.00%
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy C
WASAX22.830.18
+0.79%
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund Cl A
SNTKX25.61N/A
N/A
Steward International Enhanced Index A
JPVZX14.34N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR2
RBVAX15.49N/A
N/A
RBC Small Cap Value A

BMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMCLF and BYDDY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMCLF and BYDDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMCLF
1D Price
Change %
BMCLF100%
+5.01%
BYDDY - BMCLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
GELYF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
BYDDF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
GELYY - BMCLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.40%
NIU - BMCLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More

GELYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GELYY has been closely correlated with GELYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GELYY jumps, then GELYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GELYY
1D Price
Change %
GELYY100%
+3.40%
GELYF - GELYY
88%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
BYDDY - GELYY
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
XPEV - GELYY
63%
Loosely correlated
+6.13%
BYDDF - GELYY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
NIO - GELYY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
More