Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMDSX vs RPMGX
BMDSX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BMDSX vs RPMGX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Investor
Price$20.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
BMDSX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMDSX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDSX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. BMDSX (1.27B). BMDSX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BMDSX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BMDSX (25 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). BMDSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). BMDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). BMDSX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.53 vs. BMDSX (-7.18). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.28 vs. BMDSX (-13.59).
| BMDSX | RPMGX | BMDSX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.341 | 2.557 | -131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 27B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | -5.53 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.53 | 13.19 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.59 | 2.28 | -596% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.48 | 29.10 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement