Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGAX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv A
Price$37.15
Change+$0.42 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.44B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. BMGAX (7.44B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGAX: FSMAX (0.44) vs BMGAX (0.00). BMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGAX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. BMGAX (4.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. BMGAX (9.54).
| BMGAX | FSMAX | BMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3,229% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.246 | 11.730 | 2% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.44B | 41.4B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.70 | 17.85 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.98 | 68.00 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.54 | 50.18 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.57 | 104.77 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers