Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGAX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv A
Price$36.65
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.23B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGAX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. BMGAX (8.23B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGAX: FSMAX (0.46) vs BMGAX (0.00). BMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGAX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. BMGAX (17.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. BMGAX (16.78).
| BMGAX | FSMAX | BMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3,229% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.273 | 4.478 | -6% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.23B | 39.6B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.57 | 21.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.27 | 37.63 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.78 | 51.34 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.35 | 81.66 | 151% |